Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Masur vs Mika Brunold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Brunold analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Mika Brunold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 51.93% of points on his second serve, while Brunold has won 47.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 52.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brunold has won 53.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.26% and 34.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 62.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brunold has saved 57.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 65.22% of matches played (W/L 45/ 24), with Brunold winning 46.67% (W/L 21/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 131/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Brunold has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 15/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Brunold has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 19/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Masur winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Masur winning 2 and Brunold winning 0. The last match between Masur and Brunold was at the M25 Trimbach, 16-03-2023, Second, Carpet with Daniel Masur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Brunold have played a deciding set 0 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Brunold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 0, and Brunold 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.06 while Brunold has played against players with an average rank of 192.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brunold has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 46.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brunold has converted 49.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 0 Brunold
308
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
746
Rank
549
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
58% (381-278)
Career Total W/L
51% (46-44)
78% (29-8)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Masur | Mika Brunold |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) | 52% (24/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (22/28) | 54% (13/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (10/20) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (26/46) | 33% (16/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Mika Brunold
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Mika Brunold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 78% (29/8) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (64/22) | 48% (19/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (486/361) | 49% (187/193) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 205 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 91 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:8 | 1:55:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 168.73 | 142.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1682/2560) | 61% (747/1227) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1280/1682) | 66% (492/747) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (465/878) | 46% (223/480) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (114/259) | 50% (56/112) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1053/2681) | 41% (483/1188) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 50% (8/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (29/37) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 65% (11/17) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (31/27) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (31/4) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Daniel Masur
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
20
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Albano Olivetti
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
7
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
25 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Niklas Schell
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Mika Brunold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mika Brunold
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Darius Florin Pop
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Fadi Bidan
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Mika Brunold
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Oleg Prihodko
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Mika Brunold
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Mika Brunold
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Tibo Colson
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
85)
7
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
6
88%
(
49 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
24 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Robin Bulant
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Mika Brunold
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Masur Vs Brunold Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
