Corentin Denolly vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Denolly vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Corentin Denolly vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Denolly has won 46.83% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Denolly, in recent form, has won 54.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 44.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.7% and 29.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Denolly has saved 54.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 62.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Denolly has won 68.35% of matches played (W/L 54/ 25), with Kirchheimer winning 50% (W/L 28/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Denolly has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 254/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 52/ 42). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Player level: In the last year, Denolly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 46/ 20), where as Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Denolly winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Denolly winning 2 and Kirchheimer winning 0. The last match between Denolly and Kirchheimer was at the M15 Naples, 18-02-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Corentin Denolly getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Denolly and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Denolly winning 0 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Denolly winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Denolly has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.95 while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 291.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Denolly has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Denolly has converted 50.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 39.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Denolly 1 - 0 Kirchheimer
10
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
398
Rank
289
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
490
Rank
375
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
63% (369-219)
Career Total W/L
56% (273-212)
69% (22-10)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$45,000
Career Prize Money
$3,990
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Denolly VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Corentin Denolly | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (48/71) | 59% (39/66) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (30/48) | 62% (24/39) |
2nd Serve Win% | 65% (15/23) | 44% (12/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 45% (30/66) | 37% (26/71) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Denolly VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Corentin Denolly | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 69% (22/10) | 40% (6/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (46/23) | 46% (17/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (338/281) | 47% (161/182) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 69% (22/10) | 40% (2/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 71 | 65 |
DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.26 |
DFs Total | 129 | 43 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:29 | 1:51:25 |
Avg Opp Rank | 289.28 | 491.93 |
1st Serve % | 64% (1291/2004) | 62% (678/1099) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (835/1291) | 70% (472/678) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (326/713) | 50% (211/421) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (125/258) | 39% (31/79) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (963/2083) | 35% (369/1057) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 42% (5/7) |
Futures W/L | 74% (14/5) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (22/31) | 40% (6/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 29% (2/7) |
1st set W, W | 100% (19/19) | 50% (8/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (19/0) | 50% (8/4) |
1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 29% (7/2) |
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Duarte Vale
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Patrick Maloney
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Meecah Bigun
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Jaycer Lyeons
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Duarte Vale
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Unknown Player
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Patrick Maloney
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Sekou Bangoura
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more