Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Constance Sibille vs Michaela Honcova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sibille vs Honcova analysis and find out who is favored!
Constance Sibille vs Michaela Honcova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sibille has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Honcova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sibille, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Honcova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sibille has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Honcova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sibille has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Honcova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sibille has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 50/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 67/ 54). Honcova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 93/ 69), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sibille winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sibille winning 2 and Honcova winning 0. The last match between Sibille and Honcova was at the W100 Contrexeville, 08-07-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Constance Sibille getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sibille and Honcova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sibille winning 0 times and Honcova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sibille winning 0, and Honcova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sibille has played against opponents with an average rank of while Honcova has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sibille has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Honcova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sibille has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Honcova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sibille 1 - 0 Honcova
Ret.
Rank
265
High
33
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
218
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (259-203)
Career Total W/L
54% (271-231)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,271
Career Prize Money
$12,347
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Constance Sibille | Michaela Honcova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (34/51) | 74% (43/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (20/34) | 40% (17/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 27% (4/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 64% (37/58) | 43% (22/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Constance Sibille
Player
Michaela Honcova
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Constance Sibille | Michaela Honcova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Constance Sibille Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 7-6(3) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Gina Veyder
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Constance Sibille
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Warona Mdlulwa
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Yu Shan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Indy De Vroome
Player
Constance Sibille
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Mathilde Dury
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Orange
Player
Constance Sibille
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Constance Sibille
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Olympe Lancelot
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michaela Honcova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Katriin Saar
Player
Michaela Honcova
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
132)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
69 of
132)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(3) 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Honcova
Player
Venla Ahti
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Michaela Honcova
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Michaela Honcova
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
44%
(
15 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Michaela Honcova
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Michaela Honcova
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Michaela Honcova
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sibille Vs Honcova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
