Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Chidekh vs Mirza Basic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chidekh vs Basic analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Chidekh vs Mirza Basic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Basic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chidekh has won 51.17% of points on his second serve, while Basic has won 53.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chidekh, in recent form, has won 57.34% of his opponent's second serve points, while Basic has won 49.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.11% and 32.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chidekh has saved 60.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Basic has saved 55.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chidekh has won 69.84% of matches played (W/L 44/ 19), with Basic winning 53.66% (W/L 22/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chidekh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 60/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6). Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 140/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 25/ 10), where as Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chidekh winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chidekh winning 2 and Basic winning 0. The last match between Chidekh and Basic was at the M25 Loughborough, 13-01-2023, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 7-6(8) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chidekh and Basic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chidekh winning 0 times and Basic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chidekh winning 1, and Basic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chidekh has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.6 while Basic has played against players with an average rank of 250.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chidekh has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Basic has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chidekh has converted 50.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Basic has converted 37.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Basic
290
Rank
265
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
699
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
69% (117-53)
Career Total W/L
56% (469-365)
76% (34-11)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$6,035
Career Prize Money
$478,883
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Mirza Basic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:0 | 1:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (57/82) | 60% (46/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (36/57) | 61% (28/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (35/77) | 43% (35/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 6-4 |
Stats 
Clement Chidekh
Player
Mirza Basic
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Chidekh | Mirza Basic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (34/11) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (70/36) | 57% (26/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (544/427) | 52% (242/222) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 54% (7/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (27/6) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 135 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:46 | 1:38:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.93 | 102.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1865/3063) | 68% (981/1433) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1275/1865) | 70% (688/981) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (613/1198) | 53% (241/452) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (179/357) | 38% (55/145) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1378/3140) | 38% (595/1552) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (18/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (16/5) | 60% (12/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (33/44) | 50% (10/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 22% (2/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (14/17) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (29/28) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 3% (29/1) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (16/6) | 0% (7/0) |
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Clement Chidekh
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Anas Bennour Dit Sahli
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
14
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Clement Chidekh
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Robert Strombachs
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
0-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Tomasz Berkieta
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Clement Chidekh
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Clement Chidekh
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Carlos Lopez Montagud
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Mirza Basic
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Gabriele Bosio
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Arthur Laborde
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Mirza Basic
71%
(
92 of
129)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
38%
(
49 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
109
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marin Bradaric
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
85%
(
22 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
25
Total Points Won
19
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mirza Basic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Alen Bill
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Mirza Basic
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sean Hess
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Mili Poljicak
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Chidekh Vs Basic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mirza Basic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
