Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hun Wong vs Kris Krawcewicz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wong vs Krawcewicz analysis and find out who is favored!
Chun Hun Wong vs Kris Krawcewicz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Krawcewicz has won 45.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krawcewicz has won 56.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krawcewicz has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Krawcewicz winning 27.27% (W/L 3/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 20/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Krawcewicz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 29/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wong winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Krawcewicz winning 1. The last match between Wong and Krawcewicz was at the Qatar F2 (Doha), 04-03-2018, Q2 round, Hard with Chun Hun Wong getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wong and Krawcewicz have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wong winning 1 times and Krawcewicz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wong winning 1, and Krawcewicz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of while Krawcewicz has played against players with an average rank of 58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krawcewicz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krawcewicz has converted 57.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Krawcewicz
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
38% (20-32)
Career Total W/L
41% (67-96)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wong VS Krawcewicz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Chun Hun Wong | Kris Krawcewicz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (63/85) | 63% (62/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (39/63) | 56% (35/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (11/22) | 50% (18/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 83% (5/6) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (45/98) | 41% (35/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wong VS Krawcewicz H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 7-6(8) |
Stats 
Chun Hun Wong
Player
Kris Krawcewicz
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hun Wong | Kris Krawcewicz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (36/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (145/216) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (85/145) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (32/71) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (85/206) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Chun Hun Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hong Kit Wong
Player
Chun Hun Wong
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Chun Hun Wong
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hun Wong
Player
Maverick Banes
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hun Wong
Player
Chih Chi Huang
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hao Wu
Player
Chun Hun Wong
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chun Hun Wong
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Chun Hun Wong
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hun Wong
Player
Jason Sankey
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benard Bruno Nkomba
Player
Chun Hun Wong
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Takashi Saito
Player
Chun Hun Wong
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
15
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(4) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kris Krawcewicz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
Player
Kris Krawcewicz
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-7(4) 6-4 10-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kris Krawcewicz
Player
Vivek Kolluru
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tanguy Genier
Player
Kris Krawcewicz
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stevan Popovic
Player
Kris Krawcewicz
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Savelev
Player
Kris Krawcewicz
82%
(
54 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Wong Vs Krawcewicz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
