Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chloe Paquet vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paquet vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Chloe Paquet vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paquet has won 45.92% of points on his second serve, while Hennemann has won 44.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paquet, in recent form, has won 56.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 56.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.62% and 48.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paquet has saved 50.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 48.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paquet has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 42/ 36), with Hennemann winning 66.18% (W/L 45/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 224/ 194), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 26), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paquet winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paquet winning 1 and Hennemann winning 2. The last match between Paquet and Hennemann was at the W25 Budapest, 29-09-2021, Second, Clay with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paquet and Hennemann have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paquet winning 0 times and Hennemann 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paquet winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paquet has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.08 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 264.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paquet has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paquet has converted 42.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 51.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paquet 0 - 1 Hennemann
133
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
452
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
52% (393-365)
Career Total W/L
62% (159-96)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
78% (25-7)
$218,175
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:0 | 2:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (61/86) | 73% (54/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 48% (29/61) | 63% (34/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (17/25) | 65% (13/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (27/74) | 47% (40/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Chloe Paquet
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 78% (25/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (33/31) | 77% (53/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (296/275) | 60% (379/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 81% (13/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 62 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 114 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:30 | 1:39:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.81 | 268 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1076/1821) | 69% (1266/1822) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (672/1076) | 63% (797/1266) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (338/745) | 44% (246/556) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (119/291) | 52% (156/301) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (938/2016) | 52% (941/1796) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 89% (17/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 78% (25/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 93% (27/25) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 7% (27/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (5/0) |
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
58%
(
69 of
118)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
55 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Peyton Stearns
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Renata Zarazua
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Chloe Paquet
75%
(
78 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Sina Herrmann
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Julita Saner
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
86%
(
37 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paquet Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
