Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chantal Sauvant vs Giulia Crescenzi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sauvant vs Crescenzi analysis and find out who is favored!
Chantal Sauvant vs Giulia Crescenzi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sauvant has won 45.12% of points on his second serve, while Crescenzi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sauvant, in recent form, has won 60.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Crescenzi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sauvant has saved 49.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Crescenzi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sauvant has won 61.45% of matches played (W/L 51/ 32), with Crescenzi winning 55.56% (W/L 10/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sauvant has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 141/ 94), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Crescenzi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 77/ 84), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 63).
- Player level: In the last year, Sauvant has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14), where as Crescenzi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 9/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sauvant winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sauvant winning 1 and Crescenzi winning 2. The last match between Sauvant and Crescenzi was at the W15 Monastir, 23-01-2019, First, Hard with Giulia Crescenzi getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sauvant and Crescenzi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sauvant winning 0 times and Crescenzi 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sauvant winning 0, and Crescenzi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sauvant has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.19 while Crescenzi has played against players with an average rank of 75.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sauvant has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Crescenzi has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sauvant has converted 53.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Crescenzi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sauvant 0 - 1 Crescenzi
545
Rank
523
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
885
Rank
740
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
58% (164-117)
Career Total W/L
49% (157-164)
67% (24-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chantal Sauvant | Giulia Crescenzi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:0 | 2:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (47/88) | 61% (49/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (29/47) | 69% (34/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (15/41) | 42% (13/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (33/80) | 50% (44/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Chantal Sauvant
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chantal Sauvant | Giulia Crescenzi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (24/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (51/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (397/294) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (23/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.75 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (1473/1988) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (807/1473) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (236/515) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (172/310) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (1054/1993) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (15/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (23/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (24/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (24/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chantal Sauvant Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Chantal Sauvant
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
46%
(
11 of
24)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
60%
(
31 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
27 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Joelle Steur
82%
(
68 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
20%
(
3 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
51%
(
42 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alena Kovackova
Player
Chantal Sauvant
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Chantal Sauvant
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
82%
(
61 of
74)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Ella Haavisto
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Defne Cirpanli
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Lena Thomas Iglesias
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Denisa Hindova
Player
Chantal Sauvant
76%
(
83 of
109)
1st Serve %
74%
(
78 of
106)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
49%
(
41 of
83)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
56 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
62 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Giulia Crescenzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Giulia Crescenzi
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
64 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Helena Stevic
Player
Giulia Crescenzi
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizaveta Shebekina
Player
Giulia Crescenzi
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Lavinia Morreale
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucia Llinares Domingo
Player
Giulia Crescenzi
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Lisa Mays
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Helena Stevic
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Asylzhan Arystanbekova
63%
(
75 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
3
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
7
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
48%
(
58 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beatrice Stagno
Player
Giulia Crescenzi
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Tanisha Kashyap
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sauvant Vs Crescenzi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
