Cem Ilkel vs Vit Kopriva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Kopriva analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Vit Kopriva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.17% of points on his second serve, while Kopriva has won 43.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kopriva has won 51.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.46% and 31.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 50.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kopriva has saved 59.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40.82% of matches played (W/L 20/ 29), with Kopriva winning 58.06% (W/L 36/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 243/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 26/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Kopriva winning 7. The last match between Ilkel and Kopriva was at the Tata Open Maharashtra - Pune, 01-02-2022, First, Hard with Vit Kopriva getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Kopriva have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Kopriva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Kopriva 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 213 while Kopriva has played against players with an average rank of 270.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kopriva has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 42.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kopriva has converted 48.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 3 Kopriva
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
123
Rank
111
High
26
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
56% (401-311)
Career Total W/L
59% (340-237)
43% (9-12)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$319,625
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Vit Kopriva |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
Sets Won | 2 | 7 |
Games Won | 40 | 48 |
Aces (Total) | 21 | 19 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:53 | 1:40:53 |
1st Serve % | 64% (185/290) | 57% (152/269) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (128/185) | 80% (121/152) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (44/105) | 50% (58/117) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (9/26) | 41% (11/27) |
Return Points W% | 33% (90/269) | 41% (118/290) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Cem Ilkel
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
7-6(4) 6-3 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Cem Ilkel
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
13 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
7-5 6-2 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
6-2 6-7(1) 6-1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Vit Kopriva |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 52% (12/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 41% (19/27) | 52% (28/26) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (189/227) | 50% (254/255) |
Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 56% (9/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.34 |
Aces Total | 100 | 85 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.44 |
DFs Total | 45 | 110 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:29 |
Avg Opp Rank | 139.19 | 229.09 |
1st Serve % | 58% (710/1232) | 62% (981/1573) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (503/710) | 69% (681/981) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (243/522) | 44% (258/592) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (37/89) | 48% (69/143) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (438/1209) | 39% (603/1535) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 38% (3/5) |
Futures W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 52% (11/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 100% (10/10) |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (10/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 15% (13/2) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Vit Kopriva
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Jeff Wolf
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Rei Sakamoto
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
3
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Vit Kopriva
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(4) 6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H |
view more