Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caroline Garcia vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Caroline Garcia vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 48.32% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 49.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.14% and 36.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 55.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 53.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Hibino winning 53.73% (W/L 36/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 51/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 221/ 183). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 43/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 15/ 11), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garcia winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia winning 2 and Hibino winning 0. The last match between Garcia and Hibino was at the French Open - Paris, 30-05-2017, First, Clay with Caroline Garcia getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia and Hibino have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garcia winning 0 times and Hibino 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia winning 0, and Hibino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 93.43 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 197.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 40.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Garcia 1 - 0 Hibino
24
Rank
4
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (455-346)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-295)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
52% (14-13)
$10,031,096
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (27/41) | 59% (33/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (22/27) | 55% (18/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (8/14) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (30/56) | 27% (11/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Caroline Garcia
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 52% (14/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (31/29) | 49% (33/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (282/278) | 51% (309/299) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.63 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 171 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:37 | 1:44:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.25 | 170.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1044/1751) | 67% (1335/1987) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (743/1044) | 62% (834/1335) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (343/707) | 46% (297/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (66/168) | 47% (109/231) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (682/1802) | 43% (867/1997) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 62% (8/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 52% (14/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 64% (9/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 33% (15/5) |
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Xinyu Wang
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Caroline Garcia
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Caroline Garcia
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
9
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Caroline Garcia
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Cori Gauff
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Naomi Osaka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
