Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calum Puttergill vs Joseph Newman-Billington Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Puttergill vs Newman-Billington analysis and find out who is favored!
Calum Puttergill vs Joseph Newman-Billington Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Puttergill has won 48.42% of points on his second serve, while Newman-Billington has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Puttergill, in recent form, has won 54.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Newman-Billington has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Puttergill has saved 53.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Newman-Billington has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Puttergill has won 37.04% of matches played (W/L 10/ 17), with Newman-Billington winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Newman-Billington has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Newman-Billington has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Puttergill winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Puttergill winning 2 and Newman-Billington winning 0. The last match between Puttergill and Newman-Billington was at the M25 Nottingham, 08-05-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Calum Puttergill getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Puttergill and Newman-Billington have played a deciding set 0 times, with Puttergill winning 0 times and Newman-Billington 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Puttergill winning 0, and Newman-Billington 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Puttergill has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.52 while Newman-Billington has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Puttergill has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Newman-Billington has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Puttergill has converted 53.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Newman-Billington has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Puttergill 1 - 0 Newman-Billington
880
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
50% (170-172)
Career Total W/L
40% (10-15)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Puttergill VS Newman-Billington H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Calum Puttergill | Joseph Newman-Billington |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (29/46) | 64% (27/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 48% (13/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (12/17) | 20% (3/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (26/42) | 28% (13/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Puttergill VS Newman-Billington H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Calum Puttergill
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calum Puttergill | Joseph Newman-Billington |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (71/69) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.83 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (282/442) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (184/282) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (77/160) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (23/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (198/458) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Calum Puttergill
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Joseph Newman-Billington Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sean Hodkin
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
86%
(
63 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vito Tonejc
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Jones
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joseph Newman-Billington
Player
Max Cunat
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Finn Murgett
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
11
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joseph Newman-Billington
Player
Jack Gibbens
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
110)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joseph Newman-Billington
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Joseph Newman-Billington
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Puttergill Vs Newman-Billington Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
