Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Laura Pigossi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hennemann vs Pigossi analysis and find out who is favored!
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Laura Pigossi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hennemann has won 45.28% of points on his second serve, while Pigossi has won 46.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hennemann, in recent form, has won 56.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pigossi has won 57.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 48.25% and 39.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hennemann has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pigossi has saved 56.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hennemann has won 66.2% of matches played (W/L 47/ 24), with Pigossi winning 56.58% (W/L 43/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17). Pigossi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 249/ 198), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17), where as Pigossi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.52% of matches (W/L 37/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hennemann winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hennemann winning 0 and Pigossi winning 2. The last match between Hennemann and Pigossi was at the W15 Melilla, 16-09-2020, First, Clay with Laura Pigossi getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hennemann and Pigossi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hennemann winning 0 times and Pigossi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hennemann winning 0, and Pigossi 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.46 while Pigossi has played against players with an average rank of 304.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hennemann has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pigossi has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hennemann has converted 51.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pigossi has converted 53.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hennemann 0 - 1 Pigossi
452
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
125
Rank
100
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
62% (161-97)
Career Total W/L
55% (388-323)
77% (27-8)
YTD W/L
50% (14-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$72,485
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Laura Pigossi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (39/52) | 65% (55/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 41% (16/39) | 58% (32/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (5/13) | 55% (16/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (36/84) | 60% (31/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-0 |
Stats 
Laura Pigossi
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Laura Pigossi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 77% (27/8) | 50% (14/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 76% (57/18) | 52% (33/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (413/279) | 52% (303/278) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 89% (8/1) | 53% (9/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 79% (15/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:5 | 1:43:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 290.14 | 224.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1413/2033) | 74% (1375/1860) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (882/1413) | 59% (805/1375) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (283/620) | 47% (226/485) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (169/323) | 53% (109/207) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (1037/1981) | 45% (789/1756) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 71% (12/5) |
| Futures W/L | 89% (17/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (27/35) | 50% (14/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (29/27) | 71% (17/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (29/2) | 29% (17/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Irina Fetecau
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Vlada Katic
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Sina Herrmann
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Julita Saner
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
86%
(
37 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
view more
Laura Pigossi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Laura Pigossi
64%
(
74 of
115)
1st Serve %
83%
(
89 of
107)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Erika Andreeva
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Laura Pigossi
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Julia Middendorf
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Laura Pigossi
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
83%
(
53 of
64)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Laura Pigossi
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
75 of
100)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Laura Pigossi
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
120)
0
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
5
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
120)
114
Total Points Won
117
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadia Podoroska
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Laura Pigossi
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Xiaodi You
70%
(
84 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
10
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
55 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Hennemann Vs Pigossi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
