Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brenda Fruhvirtova vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fruhvirtova vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Brenda Fruhvirtova vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fruhvirtova 0 - 0 Hibino
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fruhvirtova has won 44.42% of points on their second serve, while Hibino has won 45.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fruhvirtova, in recent form, has won 60.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 52.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.61% and 35.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fruhvirtova has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 52.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fruhvirtova has won 83.05% of matches played (W/L 49/ 10), with Hibino winning 48.39% (W/L 30/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fruhvirtova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 86% (W/L 89/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Fruhvirtova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 92.31% of matches (W/L 36/ 3), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fruhvirtova has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.66 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 192.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fruhvirtova has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fruhvirtova has converted 50.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 45.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
88
Rank
88
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
94
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
81% (114-26)
Career Total W/L
55% (372-302)
68% (15-7)
YTD W/L
47% (18-20)
$544,180
Career Prize Money
$1,326,857
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Brenda Fruhvirtova vs Nao Hibino For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fruhvirtova VS Hibino
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Fruhvirtova VS Hibino H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brenda Fruhvirtova | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (15/7) | 47% (18/20) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (30/17) | 47% (45/50) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (227/185) | 50% (424/426) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 22% (2/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 104 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:57 | 1:44:17 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 145.45 | 167.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (870/1397) | 67% (1865/2779) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (553/870) | 63% (1166/1865) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (237/527) | 46% (421/914) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (88/174) | 46% (141/304) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (599/1273) | 42% (1174/2770) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 33% (3/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (15/21) | 47% (18/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 53% (10/19) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 67% (18/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 33% (18/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 30% (20/6) |
Brenda Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Mirra Andreeva
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
49%
(
48 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
7 of
7)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
21
Total Points Won
6
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Simona Waltert
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Taylor Townsend
72%
(
70 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Oceane Dodin
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brenda Fruhvirtova
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Arantxa Rus
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Suzan Lamens
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Nao Hibino
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Bondar
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fruhvirtova Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fruhvirtova are available here and Hibino photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brenda Fruhvirtova
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
