Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Berfu Cengiz vs Antonia Schmidt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cengiz vs Schmidt analysis and find out who is favored!
Berfu Cengiz vs Antonia Schmidt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cengiz has won 46.74% of points on his second serve, while Schmidt has won 47.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cengiz, in recent form, has won 61.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schmidt has won 56.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.51% and 37.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cengiz has saved 54.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schmidt has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cengiz has won 48.28% of matches played (W/L 28/ 30), with Schmidt winning 61.54% (W/L 40/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 94/ 55), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61). Schmidt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 34/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.09% of matches (W/L 27/ 28), where as Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.81% of matches (W/L 24/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cengiz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cengiz winning 2 and Schmidt winning 0. The last match between Cengiz and Schmidt was at the W15 Antalya, 14-01-2021, Second, Clay with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cengiz and Schmidt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cengiz winning 0 times and Schmidt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cengiz winning 0, and Schmidt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cengiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 333.86 while Schmidt has played against players with an average rank of 243.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cengiz has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schmidt has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cengiz has converted 48.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schmidt has converted 46.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cengiz 1 - 0 Schmidt
356
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
541
Rank
525
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
58% (226-166)
Career Total W/L
56% (130-103)
60% (15-10)
YTD W/L
64% (18-10)
$2,824
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Antonia Schmidt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (36/58) | 58% (51/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (20/36) | 45% (23/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (11/22) | 35% (13/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (8/19) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (52/88) | 47% (27/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Antonia Schmidt
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
52 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Antonia Schmidt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (15/10) | 64% (18/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) | 59% (38/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (302/265) | 52% (311/283) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 75% (12/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 82 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:53 | 1:54:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 333.32 | 255.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1167/1749) | 64% (1221/1903) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (706/1167) | 65% (798/1221) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (276/582) | 46% (315/682) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (115/231) | 49% (109/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (875/1878) | 44% (849/1916) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (14/10) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (15/25) | 64% (18/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 75% (6/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (14/4) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 25% (12/3) |
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Gergana Topalova
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Sandra Samir
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Berfu Cengiz
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Berfu Cengiz
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Kayla Day
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Antonia Schmidt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
Player
Antonia Schmidt
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Isabel Skoog
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Antonia Schmidt
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Antonia Schmidt
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Nina Vargova
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Antonia Schmidt
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Emeline Dartron
48%
(
38 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Antonia Schmidt
79%
(
84 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
93 of
140)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
140)
128
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cengiz Vs Schmidt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
