Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ayano Shimizu vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimizu vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Ayano Shimizu vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimizu has won 39.77% of points on his second serve, while Mandlik has won 44.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimizu, in recent form, has won 55.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 56.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.76% and 40.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimizu has saved 49.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 50.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimizu has won 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/ 26), with Mandlik winning 54.24% (W/L 32/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimizu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimizu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.02% of matches (W/L 36/ 25), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimizu winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shimizu winning 2 and Mandlik winning 0. The last match between Shimizu and Mandlik was at the W15 Sharm El Sheikh, 19-03-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Ayano Shimizu getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimizu and Mandlik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shimizu winning 0 times and Mandlik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shimizu winning 0, and Mandlik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimizu has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.71 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 194.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimizu has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimizu has converted 55.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 54.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shimizu 1 - 0 Mandlik
325
Rank
175
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
142
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (235-157)
Career Total W/L
57% (146-112)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
27% (3-8)
$112,022
Career Prize Money
$308,720
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ayano Shimizu | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (47/68) | 73% (44/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (30/47) | 50% (22/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (13/21) | 50% (8/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (30/60) | 37% (25/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ayano Shimizu | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 27% (3/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) | 35% (9/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (182/185) | 46% (109/130) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:17 | 1:36:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 422 | 154.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (862/1257) | 56% (428/759) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (490/862) | 59% (252/428) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (161/395) | 42% (138/331) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (83/151) | 53% (46/86) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (587/1211) | 45% (335/750) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 27% (3/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 11% (9/1) |
Ayano Shimizu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Arina Rodionova
69%
(
81 of
117)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
51%
(
60 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Petra Hule
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Stacey Fung
70%
(
91 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
0
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
3
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
2-6 6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Ayano Shimizu
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Ayano Shimizu
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Ayano Shimizu
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
80 of
129)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
68 of
129)
124
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Himari Sato
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Ayano Shimizu
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
38%
(
22 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
58%
(
47 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Rina Saigo
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
50 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Claire Liu
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jessika Ponchet
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimizu Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ayano Shimizu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
