Aurel Ciocanu vs Osmel RIVERA Granja Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ciocanu vs Granja analysis and find out who is favored!
Aurel Ciocanu vs Osmel RIVERA Granja Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ciocanu has won 40% of points on his second serve, while Granja has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ciocanu, in recent form, has won 56.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Granja has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.89% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ciocanu has saved 43.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Granja has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ciocanu has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 15/ 16), with Granja winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ciocanu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 36/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Granja has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Ciocanu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16), where as Granja has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ciocanu has played against opponents with an average rank of 51.16 while Granja has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ciocanu has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Granja has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ciocanu has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Granja has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ciocanu 0 - 0 Granja
Aurel Ciocanu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
Osmel RIVERA Granja
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Aurel Ciocanu | Osmel RIVERA Granja |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 45% (5/6) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (13/13) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (140/131) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.04 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 5 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 55% (70/127) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 63% (44/70) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 30% (17/57) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (5/10) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 40% (47/118) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 45% (5/6) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (5/11) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 1st Match |
Aurel Ciocanu Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 5-7 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Aurel Ciocanu
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
25 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Corban Crowther
Player
Aurel Ciocanu
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-1 | H2H |
view more
Osmel RIVERA Granja Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Fabian Hansch Mauritzson
Player
Osmel Rivera Granja
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more