Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Misaki Doi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Friedsam vs Doi analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Misaki Doi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Friedsam has won 45.21% of points on his second serve, while Doi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Friedsam, in recent form, has won 51.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Doi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Friedsam has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Doi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Friedsam has won 40.91% of matches played (W/L 18/ 26), with Doi winning 53.85% (W/L 7/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Doi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 60/ 76).
- Player level: In the last year, Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10), where as Doi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Friedsam winning 0 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 2 and Doi winning 8. The last match between Friedsam and Doi was at the Betti Open - Berlin, 13-06-2021, Q3, Grass with Misaki Doi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:57.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Friedsam and Doi have played a deciding set 2 times, with Friedsam winning 0 times and Doi 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Friedsam winning 1, and Doi 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.7 while Doi has played against players with an average rank of 232.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Friedsam has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Doi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Friedsam has converted 36.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Doi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Friedsam 0 - 4 Doi
204
Rank
45
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total4
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass2
258
Rank
30
High
33
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
59% (355-242)
Career Total W/L
51% (398-380)
27% (3-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,003,807
Career Prize Money
$1,516,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Misaki Doi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 8 |
| Games Won | 46 | 60 |
| Aces (Total) | 21 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 15 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:57 | 1:15:57 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (148/235) | 62% (161/261) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (105/148) | 71% (114/161) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (35/87) | 53% (53/100) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (5/16) | 43% (10/23) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (94/261) | 40% (95/235) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Misaki Doi
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
2
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
57 of
71)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
36 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Misaki Doi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (10/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (114/153) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.91 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (601/886) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (360/601) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (122/285) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (32/91) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (350/877) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Misaki Doi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Misaki Doi
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Petra Martic
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Arianne Hartono
Player
Misaki Doi
50%
(
52 of
103)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Misaki Doi
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Gabriela Lee
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Aneta Kladivova
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Misaki Doi
Player
Luisa Meyer Auf Der Heide
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaia Kanepi
Player
Misaki Doi
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Friedsam Vs Doi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
