Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrew Gregory vs Li Tu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gregory vs Tu analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrew Gregory vs Li Tu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gregory has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tu has won 52.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gregory, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tu has won 51.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gregory has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tu has saved 67.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gregory has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tu winning 56.34% (W/L 40/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gregory has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 18% (W/L 7/ 31). Tu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 108/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 24/ 18).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gregory has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tu has played against players with an average rank of 230.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gregory has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tu has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gregory has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tu has converted 37.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gregory 0 - 0 Tu
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
193
Rank
186
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
27% (22-60)
Career Total W/L
63% (159-92)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (13-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$98,510
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrew Gregory | Li Tu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (28/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (247/208) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 89 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:30:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 259 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (850/1300) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (615/850) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (239/450) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (49/128) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (520/1354) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 90% (9/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Andrew Gregory Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Andrew Gregory
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Li Tu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Li Tu
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Li Tu
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Li Tu
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Luke Saville
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Andre Ilagan
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Makoto Ochi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
51 of
62)
12
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F | 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Gregory Vs Tu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Li Tu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
