Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrea Lazaro Garcia vs Margot Yerolymos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Yerolymos analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrea Lazaro Garcia vs Margot Yerolymos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 47.88% of points on his second serve, while Yerolymos has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 61.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Yerolymos has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.47% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 52.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yerolymos has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 70.59% of matches played (W/L 36/ 15), with Yerolymos winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 73/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Yerolymos has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 39/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 15), where as Yerolymos has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garcia winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia winning 2 and Yerolymos winning 0. The last match between Garcia and Yerolymos was at the W25 Reims, 18-10-2020, Q1 round, I.hard with Andrea Lazaro Garcia getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia and Yerolymos have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garcia winning 0 times and Yerolymos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia winning 1, and Yerolymos 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.67 while Yerolymos has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yerolymos has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 51.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yerolymos has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Garcia 1 - 0 Yerolymos
452
Rank
180
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
858
Rank
306
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
61% (263-167)
Career Total W/L
57% (246-183)
83% (25-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$121,607
Career Prize Money
$22,359
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrea Lazaro Garcia | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:0 | 1:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (36/62) | 51% (37/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (26/36) | 62% (23/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (13/26) | 47% (17/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (33/73) | 37% (23/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Margot Yerolymos
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrea Lazaro Garcia | Margot Yerolymos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 83% (25/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 76% (50/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (354/228) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (25/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 124 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.53 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1157/1894) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (708/1157) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (355/737) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (169/324) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (1034/1963) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 80% (20/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 86% (25/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (20/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (20/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Andrea Lazaro Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Eva Vedder
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Laura Hietaranta
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Melania Delai
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Maileen Nuudi
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Lisa Pigato
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Jil Teichmann
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Ela Nala Milic
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
64 of
83)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Lia Karatancheva
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
56 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Daniela Vismane
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
28
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Margot Yerolymos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Margot Yerolymos
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mallaurie Noel
Player
Margot Yerolymos
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Margot Yerolymos
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Veronika Podrez
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Margot Yerolymos
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Margot Yerolymos
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia Vs Yerolymos Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
