Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anastasia Piangerelli vs Federica Prati Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Piangerelli vs Prati analysis and find out who is favored!
Anastasia Piangerelli vs Federica Prati Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Piangerelli has won 37.96% of points on his second serve, while Prati has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Piangerelli, in recent form, has won 59.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Prati has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Piangerelli has saved 41.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Prati has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Piangerelli has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 20/ 16), with Prati winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Piangerelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 64/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Prati has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 85/ 112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Piangerelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9), where as Prati has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Piangerelli winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Piangerelli winning 4 and Prati winning 5. The last match between Piangerelli and Prati was at the W15 Cairo, 20-09-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Anastasia Piangerelli getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Piangerelli and Prati have played a deciding set 3 times, with Piangerelli winning 1 times and Prati 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Piangerelli winning 3, and Prati 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Piangerelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 116.58 while Prati has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Piangerelli has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Prati has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Piangerelli has converted 53.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Prati has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Piangerelli 1 - 2 Prati
875
Rank
868
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
754
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
50% (85-85)
Career Total W/L
43% (135-180)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Piangerelli VS Prati H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Anastasia Piangerelli | Federica Prati |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 5 |
| Games Won | 44 | 57 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 19 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:37:0 | 2:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (185/304) | 65% (197/303) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 49% (90/185) | 59% (116/197) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (53/119) | 35% (37/106) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 51% (19/37) | 49% (24/49) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (150/303) | 53% (161/304) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
Piangerelli VS Prati H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(8) 6-4 |
Stats 
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Federica Prati
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
64 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
54 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 7-6(7) 10-4 |
Stats
Federica Prati
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
46 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-7(6) 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Federica Prati
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
107)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anastasia Piangerelli | Federica Prati |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (42/49) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 13 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (191/273) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 53% (101/191) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (33/82) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (19/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (128/278) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Anastasia Piangerelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vlada Mincheva
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
0-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Melis Ayda Uyar
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Karina Hofbauer
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Bondarenko
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Natalia Siedliska
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Aruzhan Sagandikova
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Federica Prati Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Selina Dal
Player
Federica Prati
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleni Kordolaimi
Player
Federica Prati
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
51 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Federica Prati
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Arcidiacono
Player
Federica Prati
85%
(
61 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
18%
(
2 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federica Prati
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve %
58%
(
11 of
19)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
5 of
10)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
18
Total Points Won
15
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sol Faga
Player
Federica Prati
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
52 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Federica Prati
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Lanca
Player
Federica Prati
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Piangerelli Vs Prati Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
