Ana Giraldi Requena vs Madelief Hageman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Requena vs Hageman analysis and find out who is favored!
Ana Giraldi Requena vs Madelief Hageman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Requena 0 - 1 Hageman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Requena has won 31.72% of points on their second serve, while Hageman has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Requena, in recent form, has won 58.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hageman has won 57.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.61% and 41.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Requena has saved 46.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hageman has saved 48.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Requena has won 50% of matches played (W/L 29/ 29), with Hageman winning 51.52% (W/L 34/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Requena has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 102/ 90), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 15/ 14). Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 92/ 84), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Requena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.16% of matches (W/L 22/ 21), where as Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Requena winning 0 times and Hageman being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Requena winning 0 and Hageman winning 2. The last match between Requena and Hageman was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 19-04-2024, First, Clay with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Requena and Hageman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Requena winning 0 times and Hageman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Requena winning 0, and Hageman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Requena has played against opponents with an average rank of 139.31 while Hageman has played against players with an average rank of 126.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Requena has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hageman has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Requena has converted 50.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hageman has converted 45.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (119-106)
Career Total W/L
52% (96-90)
55% (17-14)
YTD W/L
62% (21-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ana Giraldi Requena vs Madelief Hageman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Requena VS Hageman
stats | Ana Giraldi Requena | Madelief Hageman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 9 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 12 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (43/76) | 61% (42/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (28/43) | 57% (24/42) |
2nd Serve Win% | 27% (9/33) | 67% (18/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 43% (6/14) |
Return Points W% | 39% (27/69) | 51% (39/76) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-5 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
12
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ana Giraldi Requena | Madelief Hageman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (17/14) | 62% (21/13) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (38/32) | 59% (49/34) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (334/326) | 55% (420/350) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 55% (17/14) | 63% (20/12) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.07 |
Aces Total | 13 | 27 |
DFs per game | 0.61 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 197 | 58 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:27:10 |
Avg Opp Rank | 128.97 | 132.82 |
1st Serve % | 59% (689/1171) | 63% (1143/1804) |
1st Serve W% | 56% (389/689) | 58% (659/1143) |
2nd Serve W% | 31% (149/482) | 49% (324/661) |
BPs Won% Total | 53% (85/161) | 46% (110/240) |
Return Pts W% | 50% (564/1119) | 47% (851/1823) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 50% (2/2) |
Futures W/L | 57% (13/10) | 63% (19/11) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (17/31) | 62% (21/34) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 33% (2/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 53% (8/15) |
1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 81% (21/17) |
1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 19% (21/4) |
1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 31% (13/4) |
Ana Giraldi Requena Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Dunja Maric
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ana Giraldi Requena
Player
Milica Popovski
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
3
Aces
0
20
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
31%
(
12 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
42 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
89
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Anja Stankovic
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
11
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ana Giraldi Requena
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
83%
(
59 of
71)
1
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(4) 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Virginia Ferrara
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
73%
(
81 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
14
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
9 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
55 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
60 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Madelief Hageman
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Suana Tucakovic
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Mana Kawamura
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
82%
(
27 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 0-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-2 13-11 | H2H | |||
SF |
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Madelief Hageman
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Madelief Hageman
Player
Dimitra Pavlou
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
113)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
48 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Requena Vs Hageman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Requena are available here and Hageman photos here.