Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amelie Van Impe vs Zeel Desai Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Impe vs Desai analysis and find out who is favored!
Amelie Van Impe vs Zeel Desai Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Impe has won 42.42% of points on his second serve, while Desai has won 42.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Impe, in recent form, has won 60.13% of his opponent's second serve points, while Desai has won 56.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.15% and 39.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Impe has saved 54.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Desai has saved 41.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Impe has won 61.4% of matches played (W/L 35/ 22), with Desai winning 54.39% (W/L 31/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Impe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 23/ 17). Desai has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 29/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Impe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 16/ 16), where as Desai has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Impe has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.7 while Desai has played against players with an average rank of 238.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Impe has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Desai has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Impe has converted 52.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Desai has converted 48.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Impe 0 - 0 Desai
498
Rank
456
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
585
Rank
511
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
63% (73-42)
Career Total W/L
58% (175-129)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
35% (7-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amelie Van Impe | Zeel Desai |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 35% (7/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (6/12) | 38% (16/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (78/99) | 46% (167/199) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 37% (7/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 13 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:17 | 1:32:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 270.71 | 225.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (370/508) | 63% (724/1143) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (220/370) | 55% (396/724) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (55/138) | 41% (171/419) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (24/50) | 48% (78/161) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (204/486) | 47% (571/1227) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 36% (5/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 37% (7/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 8% (12/1) |
Amelie Van Impe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Yaroslava Bartashevich
Player
Amelie Van Impe
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Amelie Van Impe
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
10
Total Points Won
11
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelie Van Impe
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Sina Herrmann
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Amelie Van Impe
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
83)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Laura Hietaranta
79%
(
81 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Amelie Van Impe
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Amelie Van Impe
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Amelie Van Impe
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Zeel Desai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Vaishnavi Adkar
Player
Zeel Desai
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Merna Refaat
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yujin Ahn
Player
Zeel Desai
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arabella Koller
Player
Zeel Desai
89%
(
56 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Zeel Desai
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Akiko Omae
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ankita Raina
Player
Zeel Desai
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Vaidehi Chaudhari
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Zeel Desai
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Tyra Lithiby
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Impe Vs Desai Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
