Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Altug Celikbilek vs Florent Diep Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Celikbilek vs Diep analysis and find out who is favored!
Altug Celikbilek vs Florent Diep Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Celikbilek has won 44.96% of points on his second serve, while Diep has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Celikbilek, in recent form, has won 51.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Diep has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Celikbilek has saved 61.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Diep has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Celikbilek has won 47.27% of matches played (W/L 26/ 29), with Diep winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Celikbilek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 251/ 176), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 30/ 40). Diep has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 141/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Celikbilek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22), where as Diep has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Celikbilek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Celikbilek winning 2 and Diep winning 0. The last match between Celikbilek and Diep was at the Turkey F1 (Antalya), 13-01-2017, Second, Hard with Altug Celikbilek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Celikbilek and Diep have played a deciding set 0 times, with Celikbilek winning 0 times and Diep 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Celikbilek winning 1, and Diep 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Celikbilek has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.42 while Diep has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Celikbilek has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Diep has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Celikbilek has converted 42.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Diep has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Celikbilek 1 - 0 Diep
401
Rank
154
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
592
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
56% (348-273)
Career Total W/L
51% (176-171)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$231,155
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celikbilek VS Diep H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Altug Celikbilek | Florent Diep |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (41/67) | 57% (40/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (31/41) | 70% (28/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (16/26) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (29/70) | 30% (20/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Celikbilek VS Diep H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Florent Diep
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Altug Celikbilek | Florent Diep |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (36/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (320/271) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 157 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 284.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1122/1836) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (803/1122) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (329/714) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (76/175) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (692/1768) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (16/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (16/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Altug Celikbilek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Altug Celikbilek
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Linang Xiao
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
27
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
36 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Altug Celikbilek
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Jie Cui
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Altug Celikbilek
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sanhui Shin
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Altug Celikbilek
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Max Wiskandt
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Florent Diep Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Florent Diep
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Anis Ghorbel
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Alcalde
Player
Florent Diep
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Florent Diep
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Florent Diep
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(8) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Lucas Catarina
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Celikbilek Vs Diep Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
