Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alejandro MORO Canas vs Rudolf Molleker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Canas vs Molleker analysis and find out who is favored!
Alejandro MORO Canas vs Rudolf Molleker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Canas has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Molleker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Canas, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Molleker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Canas has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Molleker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Canas has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Molleker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Canas has played against opponents with an average rank of while Molleker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Canas has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Molleker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Canas has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Molleker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Canas 0 - 0 Molleker
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Alejandro MORO Canas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Vilius Gaubas
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Stefano Travaglia
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Zsombor Piros
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Dominic Thiem
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Francesco Passaro
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Rudolf Molleker
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Nick Hardt
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Rudolf Molleker
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Rudolf Molleker
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve %
57%
(
12 of
21)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
10 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
23
Total Points Won
16
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ricardas Berankis
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
17
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
7
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Canas Vs Molleker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
