Zoe Hives vs Na-Lae Han Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hives vs Han analysis and find out who is favored!
Zoe Hives vs Na-Lae Han Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hives has won 54.39% of points on his second serve, while Han has won 45.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hives, in recent form, has won 57.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Han has won 54.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.77% and 44.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hives has saved 78.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Han has saved 67.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hives has won 75% of matches played (W/L 3/ 1), with Han winning 38.1% (W/L 8/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hives has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 12/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 80/ 57). Han has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 352/ 221), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hives has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 3/ 1), where as Han has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 5/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hives winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hives winning 1 and Han winning 2. The last match between Hives and Han was at the W60 Lexington, 02-08-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Na-Lae Han getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hives and Han have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hives winning 0 times and Han 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hives winning 1, and Han 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hives has played against opponents with an average rank of 157 while Han has played against players with an average rank of 275.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hives has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Han has won 13% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hives has converted 53.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Han has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hives 0 - 1 Han
4
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
891
Rank
140
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
552
Rank
149
High
31
Age
L
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
11
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
60% (136-90)
Career Total W/L
59% (385-267)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$307,080
Career Prize Money
$215,705
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Zoe Hives | Na-Lae Han |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 13 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:6:0 | 2:6:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (58/92) | 62% (50/81) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (36/58) | 68% (34/50) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (14/34) | 45% (14/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 47% (7/15) |
Return Points W% | 41% (33/81) | 46% (42/92) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-2 |
Na-Lae Han
Player
Zoe Hives
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Zoe Hives | Na-Lae Han |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 74% (46/16) | 33% (6/12) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
Aces Total | 6 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
DFs Total | 8 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 157 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (71/128) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (49/71) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (31/57) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 54% (7/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (44/107) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zoe Hives Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Zoe Hives
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zoe Hives
Player
Gloria Jovic
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Zoe Hives
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zoe Hives
Player
Harmony Tan
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
Robin |
Katie Swan
Player
Zoe Hives
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Zoe Hives
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Angelica Blake
Player
Zoe Hives
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Zoe Hives
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Na-Lae Han Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Na-Lae Han
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
134)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
27%
(
7 of
26)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
63 of
134)
124
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Na-Lae Han
Player
Anri Nagata
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Na-Lae Han
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Na-Lae Han
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arantxa Rus
Player
Na-Lae Han
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Carol Zhao
Player
Na-Lae Han
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Na-Lae Han
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Na-Lae Han
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Na-Lae Han
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
85%
(
93 of
109)
1st Serve %
81%
(
112 of
139)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
49%
(
46 of
93)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
60 of
112)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
54 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
69 of
139)
124
Total Points Won
124
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more