Zdenek Kolar vs Elmer Moller Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Zdenek Kolar and Elmer Moller compare in second serve performance over the last six months? Kolar edges slightly ahead with 42.70% of points won compared to Moller's 41.34%.
• In return game stats, Moller outperforms Kolar on both first and second serve returns, claiming 49.36% of second serve points and 33.27% of first serve points, whereas Kolar has 45.87% and 26.59% respectively.
• Under pressure, both players show similar competence in saving breakpoints, with Moller saving 54.65% and Kolar 54.17%.
• Looking at overall performance in the past year, Kolar has a higher match win rate of 65.66% compared to Moller's 52.73%.
• Their best career surface for both is clay, with each having a winning percentage of 60%. However, Kolar struggles more on hard courts (39% win rate) compared to Moller's difficulty on grass (0% win rate).
• What about their match levels? Kolar's recent matches have been primarily at the Challengers/ITF level with a win rate of 63.93%, slightly higher than Moller's 58.97% in similar events.
• In terms of opponent quality, Moller has faced tougher competitors with an average rank of 213.09, compared to Kolar's 361.54.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Kolar has a slight advantage with a 64% win rate over the past year, slightly better than Moller's 61%.
• During breakpoint conversions, Moller is significantly more effective, converting 39.87% compared to Kolar's 28.91%.

Editorial Prediction (November 21, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the head-to-head statistics between Zdenek Kolar and Elmer Moller, a few key points stand out that could influence the outcome of the upcoming match.

Although Kolar shows a slightly superior performance on second serve points, Moller counteracts with a stronger return game on both first and second serves. This capability could potentially give Moller the upper hand during crucial points.

Kolar's higher overall win percentage in the past year suggests consistency, but Moller’s exposure to higher-ranked opponents might have prepared him better for more challenging matches.

Both players are evenly matched on their preferred surface, clay, making it a level playing field in this regard. Moller’s superior breakpoint conversion rate could also be a decisive factor when capitalizing on key moments in the match.

Considering all the evidence, while both players present strong cases, Elmer Moller is slightly favored to win this tennis match based on recent performance trends and key statistical advantages.