Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yuta Shimizu vs Otto Virtanen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimizu vs Virtanen analysis and find out who is favored!
Yuta Shimizu vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimizu has won 51.46% of points on his second serve, while Virtanen has won 47.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimizu, in recent form, has won 50.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Virtanen has won 51.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.16% and 31.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimizu has saved 65.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Virtanen has saved 59.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimizu has won 52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 24), with Virtanen winning 56.25% (W/L 36/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimizu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 26/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13). Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 111/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 15/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimizu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.35% of matches (W/L 25/ 21), where as Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimizu winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Shimizu winning 2 and Virtanen winning 1. The last match between Shimizu and Virtanen was at the M25 Aktobe, 23-02-2020, Final, I.hard with Yuta Shimizu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimizu and Virtanen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Shimizu winning 1 times and Virtanen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shimizu winning 0, and Virtanen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimizu has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.06 while Virtanen has played against players with an average rank of 238.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimizu has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Virtanen has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimizu has converted 41.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Virtanen has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shimizu 1 - 0 Virtanen
264
Rank
203
High
24
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
158
Rank
109
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
65% (229-125)
Career Total W/L
60% (182-121)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
67% (20-10)
$60,235
Career Prize Money
$146,665
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yuta Shimizu | Otto Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (63/100) | 53% (53/100) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (44/63) | 66% (35/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (17/37) | 47% (22/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (43/100) | 39% (39/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Otto Virtanen
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
4
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yuta Shimizu | Otto Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 67% (20/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (25/18) | 63% (42/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (229/212) | 53% (339/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 94% (16/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 248 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 125 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:19 | 1:24:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288.9 | 233.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (855/1438) | 59% (1215/2065) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (601/855) | 72% (875/1215) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (305/583) | 47% (397/850) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (52/132) | 45% (90/201) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (568/1451) | 39% (776/1966) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 71% (17/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 75% (9/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 23% (13/3) |
Yuta Shimizu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Yuta Shimizu
50%
(
61 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
123)
19
Aces
3
17
Double Faults
4
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
47%
(
28 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
43 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Omar Jasika
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Yuta Shimizu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Dominik Palan
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Yuta Shimizu
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mattia Bellucci
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Ergi Kirkin
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Otto Virtanen
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
70 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Jurij Rodionov
89%
(
77 of
87)
1st Serve %
100%
(
78 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimizu Vs Virtanen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
