Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yuriko Miyazaki vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Miyazaki vs Jacquemot analysis and find out who is favored!
Yuriko Miyazaki vs Elsa Jacquemot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Miyazaki has won 46.59% of points on his second serve, while Jacquemot has won 41.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Miyazaki, in recent form, has won 56.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jacquemot has won 54.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.22% and 38.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Miyazaki has saved 54.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jacquemot has saved 52.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Miyazaki has won 61.43% of matches played (W/L 43/ 27), with Jacquemot winning 56.41% (W/L 44/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Miyazaki has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 68/ 38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 22/ 26). Jacquemot has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Miyazaki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.3% of matches (W/L 38/ 23), where as Jacquemot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.9% of matches (W/L 33/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Miyazaki winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Miyazaki winning 2 and Jacquemot winning 1. The last match between Miyazaki and Jacquemot was at the W60 Montpellier, 30-06-2021, First, Clay with Yuriko Miyazaki getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Miyazaki and Jacquemot have played a deciding set 1 times, with Miyazaki winning 1 times and Jacquemot 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Miyazaki winning 0, and Jacquemot 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Miyazaki has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.84 while Jacquemot has played against players with an average rank of 255.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Miyazaki has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jacquemot has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Miyazaki has converted 49.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jacquemot has converted 46.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Miyazaki 1 - 0 Jacquemot
140
Rank
138
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
158
Rank
143
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
60% (248-162)
Career Total W/L
53% (129-116)
67% (18-9)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$198,182
Career Prize Money
$273,923
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yuriko Miyazaki | Elsa Jacquemot |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (46/75) | 50% (42/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (30/46) | 62% (26/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (18/29) | 43% (18/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (40/84) | 36% (27/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yuriko Miyazaki | Elsa Jacquemot |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (18/9) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (41/25) | 52% (27/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (339/281) | 49% (244/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (16/5) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 89 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 92 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:37 | 1:52:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 319.26 | 282.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1274/2016) | 62% (951/1540) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (831/1274) | 64% (609/951) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (354/742) | 43% (255/589) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (121/248) | 46% (90/194) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (933/2050) | 45% (748/1670) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (18/8) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 40% (15/6) |
Yuriko Miyazaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Ena Koike
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Moeka Miyata
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Mona Barthel
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Amarni Banks
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Arina Rodionova
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Valentina Ryser
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
61%
(
71 of
116)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
8
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(0) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Sinja Kraus
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
51%
(
37 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Harriet Dart
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
12
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
42 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Haley Giavara
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
113)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Miyazaki Vs Jacquemot Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
