Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yuriko Miyazaki vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Miyazaki vs Jacquemot analysis and find out who is favored!
Yuriko Miyazaki vs Elsa Jacquemot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Miyazaki 1 - 0 Jacquemot
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Miyazaki has won 46.7% of points on his second serve, while Jacquemot has won 41.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Miyazaki, in recent form, has won 55.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jacquemot has won 55.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.26% and 39.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Miyazaki has saved 54.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jacquemot has saved 53.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Miyazaki has won 59.15% of matches played (W/L 42/ 29), with Jacquemot winning 58.54% (W/L 48/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Miyazaki has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 68/ 38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 22/ 29). Jacquemot has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Miyazaki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.67% of matches (W/L 37/ 23), where as Jacquemot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.32% of matches (W/L 38/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Miyazaki winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Miyazaki winning 2 and Jacquemot winning 1. The last match between Miyazaki and Jacquemot was at the W60 Montpellier, 30-06-2021, First, Clay with Yuriko Miyazaki getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Miyazaki and Jacquemot have played a deciding set 1 times, with Miyazaki winning 1 times and Jacquemot 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Miyazaki winning 0, and Jacquemot 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Miyazaki has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.51 while Jacquemot has played against players with an average rank of 276.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Miyazaki has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jacquemot has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Miyazaki has converted 48.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jacquemot has converted 45.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
133
Rank
133
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
150
Rank
143
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (248-165)
Career Total W/L
53% (134-119)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$198,182
Career Prize Money
$273,923
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yuriko Miyazaki | Elsa Jacquemot |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (46/75) | 50% (42/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (30/46) | 62% (26/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (18/29) | 43% (18/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (40/84) | 36% (27/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yuriko Miyazaki | Elsa Jacquemot |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (41/31) | 54% (38/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (356/319) | 51% (343/328) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (16/5) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 137 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 146 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:39 | 1:52:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 307.9 | 325.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1371/2209) | 60% (1291/2149) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (884/1371) | 65% (837/1291) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (399/838) | 43% (365/858) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (124/261) | 45% (133/296) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (991/2224) | 46% (1038/2272) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (18/9) | 65% (15/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 67% (8/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 37% (19/7) |
Yuriko Miyazaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sijia Wei
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Ena Koike
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Moeka Miyata
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Mona Barthel
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Amarni Banks
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Arina Rodionova
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
65%
(
97 of
150)
1st Serve %
54%
(
68 of
127)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
14
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
6 of
32)
45%
(
67 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
140
Total Points Won
137
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Heather Watson
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Olivia Gadecki
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
7
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Katarina Zavatska
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Miyazaki Vs Jacquemot Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
