Yuriko Miyazaki vs Celine Naef Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 May at 06:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Miyazaki vs C. Naef

GBR
1
Win
Played
1
Win

SUI
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Miyazaki 1 - 1 Naef
They have played 5 sets in total, with Yuriko Miyazaki winning 2 and Celine Naef winning 3. The last match between Yuriko Miyazaki and Celine Naef was at the Lexus Birmingham Open - Birmingham, 31-05-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Yuriko Miyazaki getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Miyazaki | 1 |
| Naef | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Lexus Birmingham Open - Birmingham(05-31-25)
(R2) W40 Porto(02-09-23)
Y. Miyazaki vs C. Naef H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $305,357 | Career Prize Money | $220,512 |
| 59.15% (294-203) | Career Total W/L | 62.69% (126-75) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
Y. Miyazaki vs C. Naef Match Preview:
- Miyazaki's recent second serve performance shows a win rate of 36.27%, compared to Naef’s 42.49%. Could this indicate an advantage for Naef?
- In return games, Miyazaki has captured 52.64% of points on opponents' second serves, surpassing Naef’s 47.01%, and 33.11% on first serve returns against Naef’s 29.19%.
- Both players demonstrate similar resilience under pressure, with Miyazaki saving 47.11% of breakpoints and Naef 48.9%.
- Over the past year, Miyazaki’s match win rate is 51.92%, while Naef holds a stronger 58.18% win rate.
- Both players prefer indoor hard courts, but Naef boasts a higher career win rate of 73% compared to Miyazaki's 65% on this surface.
- Recently, Naef has competed against slightly stronger opponents, with an average opponent rank of 240.8 versus Miyazaki's 261.6.
- In head-to-head encounters, Naef leads 1-0, winning both sets played.
- Break point conversion favors Miyazaki, who has a 43.66% success rate, opposed to Naef’s 33.56%.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Naef has a 71% win rate, indicating she might have the edge over Miyazaki's 59%.
Editorial Prediction (May 31, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Miyazaki and Naef displays intriguing statistics and potential narratives. Naef’s superior second serve performance suggests she might secure more points during her service games.
Miyazaki excels in returning, especially against second serves, indicating she could puncture Naef’s service games. However, their head-to-head history, with Naef prevailing previously, could provide her with psychological confidence.
Considering Naef's better overall win percentage and her advantage on indoor hard courts, she appears to be the probable winner in this matchup.
Yuriko Miyazaki vs Celine Naef Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Miyazaki vs C. Naef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 25 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:44:6 | Average Match Time | 1:44:6 |
| 66% (104/158) | 1st Serve % | 54% (86/160) |
| 62% (64/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (60/86) |
| 46% (25/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (34/74) |
| 36% (8/22) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (9/21) |
| 41% (66/160) | Return Points Win % | 44% (69/158) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Miyazaki Recent Matches Played
C. Naef Recent Matches Played

Y. Miyazaki vs C. Naef Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.15% (294/203) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.69% (126/75) |
| 56.80% (656/499) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.75% (282/190) |
| 52.79% (5598/5006) | Games Win/Loss | 54.38% (2357/1977) |
| 61.48% (158/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 42.31% (22/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.98% (26/25) |
| 64.83% (94/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 72.45% (71/27) |
| 46.51% (20/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 694 | Aces Total | 597 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1706 | Total Double Faults | 471 |
| 1:18:2 | Average Match Time | 1:36:47 |
| 448.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 313.23 |
| 62% (17118/27438) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8273/13894) |
| 63% (10794/17118) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (5318/8273) |
| 44% (4575/10320) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2730/5621) |
| 48% (1760/3646) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (862/1729) |
| 46% (13215/28436) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6337/13848) |
| 44.00% (11/14) | Slam W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 47.37% (9/10) | Main Tour W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 58.86% (196/137) | Challenger W/L | 66.01% (101/52) |
| 66.10% (78/40) | Futures W/L | 86.67% (13/2) |
| 59% (286/487) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (126/200) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (44/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (21/40) |
| 56% (92/165) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (40/69) |
| 86% (269/230) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (118/102) |
| 14% (269/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (118/16) |
| 27% (228/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (83/24) |