Yibing Wu vs Maxime Cressy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jun at 06:26 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Wu vs M. Cressy

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wu 1 - 0 Cressy
They have played 1 sets in total, with Yibing Wu winning 1 and Maxime Cressy winning 0. The last match between Yibing Wu and Maxime Cressy was at the Tyler Challenger, 02-06-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Yibing Wu getting the victory 7-5 ret..
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Wu | 1 |
Cressy | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Tyler Challenger(06-02-25)
Y. Wu vs M. Cressy H2H Profile
Y. Wu vs M. Cressy Match Preview:
- When analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Wu has a slight edge, winning 48.1% of points compared to Cressy's 47.38%. Does this small advantage significantly influence the match outcome? It might suggest a possible edge for Wu.
- In return games, however, Cressy surpasses Wu by winning 46.54% of opponents' second serve points, while Wu achieves 40.15%. On first serve returns, Wu leads with 23.48% against Cressy's 20.26%, hinting at Wu's strength in that area.
- Examining performance under pressure, Cressy has saved 61.45% of breakpoints lately, which is slightly better than Wu's 59.65%, suggesting Cressy may be more resilient in crucial moments.
- Overall win-loss records from the past year favor Wu, who has a higher winning percentage of 58.82% versus Cressy’s 41.67%. Does this indicate greater consistency for Wu? It appears so.
- On their preferred surface, I.hard, Wu boasts an impressive 91% win rate, in comparison to Cressy's 63%. Does Wu have a more commanding performance on this surface? The stats strongly suggest it.
- In tournaments exceeding $10K, Wu has won 72.73% of his matches, compared to Cressy's 33.33%, indicating Wu may perform better in higher-level events.
- Wu has faced tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 228.06, while Cressy’s opponents averaged 312.83, implying Wu may be more battle-tested.
- In deciding set scenarios, Wu has a better record, winning 57% compared to Cressy's 47%, which could play a crucial role in close matches.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Wu has a better recent form, converting 47.37% of opportunities, compared to Cressy's conversion rate of 42.42%, suggesting Wu might capitalize better on crucial points.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match displays intriguing contrasts in strengths and recent performances for both Wu and Cressy. Wu exhibits a slight edge in second serve performance and shows proficiency in converting crucial breakpoint opportunities.
Cressy's resilience under pressure and strong return game statistics could challenge Wu, yet Wu's historical win-loss record and higher success against tougher competition frame him as the more consistent player.
On I.hard surfaces, Wu's exceptional win rate further underscores his advantage. Collectively, these insights make Wu the more likely winner in this matchup.
Yibing Wu vs Maxime Cressy Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Wu vs M. Cressy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | Sets Won | 0 |
7 | Games Won | 5 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
0:51:47 | Average Match Time | 0:51:47 |
58% (18/31) | 1st Serve % | 46% (18/39) |
89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (14/18) |
46% (6/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
46% (18/39) | Return Points Win % | 29% (9/31) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Wu Recent Matches Played
M. Cressy Recent Matches Played

Y. Wu vs M. Cressy Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64.19% (147/82) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.88% (247/195) |
60.94% (323/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.87% (591/486) |
53.41% (2715/2368) | Games Win/Loss | 52.14% (5680/5214) |
62.67% (94/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.59% (116/89) |
61.54% (32/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.62% (18/34) |
90.91% (20/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.19% (91/53) |
20.00% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.66% (22/19) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.97 |
832 | Aces Total | 5177 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.55 |
464 | Total Double Faults | 2922 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:38:47 |
390.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.01 |
62% (9355/15075) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18824/30415) |
69% (6427/9355) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (14791/18824) |
53% (3018/5720) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5960/11591) |
42% (604/1442) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (804/2196) |
39% (5870/14950) | Return Points Win % | 34% (10487/31045) |
53.33% (8/7) | Slam W/L | 52.38% (22/20) |
37.50% (6/10) | Masters W/L | 30.00% (9/21) |
60.00% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
55.26% (21/17) | Main Tour W/L | 48.04% (49/53) |
70.00% (70/30) | Challenger W/L | 57.49% (96/71) |
70.91% (39/16) | Futures W/L | 70.30% (71/30) |
67% (139/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (238/418) |
50% (5/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (8/21) |
59% (49/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (119/267) |
63% (45/71) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (80/162) |
90% (135/122) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (256/212) |
10% (135/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (256/44) |
30% (93/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (186/35) |