Yexin Ma vs Anna Bondar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 09:22 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Ma vs A. Bondar

CHN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

HUN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Ma 0 - 1 Bondar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yexin Ma winning 0 and Anna Bondar winning 2. The last match between Anna Bondar and Yexin Ma was at the WTA 125 Jinan Open - Jinan, 16-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 7-6(10) 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ma | 0 |
Bondar | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) WTA 125 Jinan Open - Jinan(10-16-25)
Y. Ma vs A. Bondar H2H Profile
Y. Ma vs A. Bondar Match Preview:
- On second serve effectiveness, Anna Bondar outperformed Yexin Ma, capturing 43.84% of points compared to Ma's 39.43%. Could this give Bondar an edge in the match? It certainly seems so, given the correlation with outcomes.
- When analyzing return game stats, Yexin Ma slightly leads on second serve returns, winning 49.69% compared to Bondar's 49.16%. Yet, on first serve returns, Ma also leads with 32.52% while Bondar's success is 30.53%.
- Under pressure, Bondar shows resilience by saving 49.47% of breakpoints, a notch above Ma's 47.18%. Does this indicate a potential advantage in crucial moments?
- Looking at overall performance, Bondar has a slight edge in matches won over the past year, boasting a win rate of 56.72% against Ma's 53.85%.
- Both players excel on clay, with identical career win percentages of 69%. However, grass poses a challenge for Bondar with an 11% win rate, whereas Ma performs moderately with a 50% rate.
- In tournaments above $10K, Bondar dominates with a 73.91% win rate, whereas Ma has a 55.74% success rate. This suggests Bondar might be more adept in higher-stakes matches.
- Considering opponent quality, Bondar has faced stronger competitors, with an average opponent rank of 166.69, compared to Ma’s 304.06.
- Notably in deciding sets, Yexin Ma excels, winning 58% compared to Bondar's 47%, a factor to consider in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Anna Bondar and Yexin Ma promises to be competitive, with both players showing distinct strengths.
Bondar's edge in second serve performance and breakpoint resilience may give her an initial advantage. Although Ma's return stats are slightly more favorable, Bondar's experience against higher-ranked opponents might prepare her better for critical match moments.
Ma's success in deciding sets could be crucial if the match becomes tightly contested. However, the competitive balance on their preferred clay surface might neutralize this.
Given the comparison of their recent performances and overall match statistics, Anna Bondar appears to have a slight edge in this matchup and is more likely to secure the win.
Yexin Ma vs Anna Bondar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Ma vs A. Bondar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
8 | Games Won | 13 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:52:19 | Average Match Time | 1:52:19 |
57% (40/70) | 1st Serve % | 57% (43/76) |
53% (21/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (29/43) |
57% (17/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
41% (31/76) | Return Points Win % | 46% (32/70) |
0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Ma Recent Matches Played
A. Bondar Recent Matches Played

Y. Ma vs A. Bondar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54.44% (288/241) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.05% (442/259) |
53.93% (652/557) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.23% (984/623) |
52.35% (5736/5221) | Games Win/Loss | 54.15% (8121/6875) |
54.09% (218/185) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.49% (91/73) |
54.79% (40/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.08% (324/145) |
58.97% (23/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.07% (26/33) |
50.00% (7/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 11.11% (1/8) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
624 | Aces Total | 2201 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
1600 | Total Double Faults | 1221 |
1:26:52 | Average Match Time | 1:29:42 |
485.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.58 |
59% (17418/29669) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24402/41444) |
61% (10638/17418) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16105/24402) |
46% (5638/12249) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (8181/17042) |
48% (1972/4123) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2349/5032) |
47% (14410/30538) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18716/42196) |
33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 27.59% (8/21) |
0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
37.50% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (55/55) |
53.73% (173/149) | Challenger W/L | 66.28% (230/117) |
58.47% (107/76) | Futures W/L | 78.21% (122/34) |
54% (281/519) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (434/692) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
51% (49/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (96/182) |
48% (78/161) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (104/210) |
84% (300/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (451/392) |
16% (300/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (451/59) |
15% (229/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (250/50) |