Yeon Woo Ku vs Wushuang Zheng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 May at 04:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Woo Ku vs W. Zheng

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ku 1 - 0 Zheng
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yeon Woo Ku winning 2 and Wushuang Zheng winning 0. The last match between Yeon Woo Ku and Wushuang Zheng was at the W35 Andong, 21-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ku | 1 |
| Zheng | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Andong(05-21-25)
Y. W. Ku vs W. Zheng H2H Profile
Y. W. Ku vs W. Zheng Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance compare between the players? Zheng has a slight edge, winning 39.87% of points compared to Ku's 39.38% in recent months.
- In terms of return game strength, Zheng again shows a small advantage by winning 50.82% of points against opponents' second serves, slightly ahead of Ku's 50.43%.
- Who has the stronger first serve return stats? Ku takes a lead here with 35.32% compared to Zheng's 33.59%.
- Under pressure, Ku proves more resilient, saving 51.93% of breakpoints versus Zheng's 45.52%.
- Considering overall match performance in the past year, Zheng has a superior win rate at 65.28%, over Ku's 57.14%.
- Surface preferences show that Zheng performs consistently on Hard and best on Clay, while Ku's best results come on Indoor Hard surfaces.
- Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF events, but Zheng demonstrates better success with a 66.2% win rate, compared to Ku's 55.77%.
- Facing higher-ranked foes, Zheng encounters an average rank of 366.97, slightly tougher than Ku's average opponent rank of 392.14.
- In deciding sets over the last year, Zheng performs better, winning 46% of such situations as opposed to Ku's 32%.
- What about breakpoint conversion? Zheng outshines again, converting breakpoints at 41.44% to Ku’s 35.36%.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
As Zheng and Ku prepare to face off, the subtle statistical edges of each player come into focus. Zheng has demonstrated superior overall performance with a higher match win rate in the past year and slightly better second serve and return performance, crucial indicators for match prediction. Additionally, Zheng has proven more effective in converting break points, providing a strategic advantage during crucial moments in the match.
While Ku exhibits commendable skills, particularly in first serve returns and pressure situations, Zheng’s stronger showing against higher-ranked opponents and more frequent success in deciding sets could play a pivotal role in determining the outcome.
Based on these statistics and performance patterns, Zheng appears the more favored to claim victory in the upcoming match, leveraging consistency and tactical execution to their advantage.
Yeon Woo Ku vs Wushuang Zheng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. W. Ku vs W. Zheng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:22:3 | Average Match Time | 1:22:3 |
| 75% (30/40) | 1st Serve % | 62% (34/55) |
| 60% (18/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (13/34) |
| 60% (6/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (3/3) |
| 64% (35/55) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. W. Ku Recent Matches Played
W. Zheng Recent Matches Played

Y. W. Ku vs W. Zheng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.83% (212/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.03% (224/162) |
| 63.86% (477/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.16% (499/359) |
| 57.18% (3850/2883) | Games Win/Loss | 53.93% (4105/3507) |
| 64.59% (166/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.39% (181/129) |
| 64.86% (24/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.16% (41/32) |
| 68.97% (20/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 234 | Aces Total | 268 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1048 | Total Double Faults | 478 |
| 1:25:43 | Average Match Time | 1:12:18 |
| 463.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.73 |
| 64% (12133/18964) | 1st Serve % | 66% (11870/18117) |
| 61% (7379/12133) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (7046/11870) |
| 45% (3096/6831) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2924/6247) |
| 52% (1445/2788) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1208/2494) |
| 50% (9520/18945) | Return Points Win % | 47% (8825/18739) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 62.83% (142/84) | Challenger W/L | 55.39% (149/120) |
| 74.42% (64/22) | Futures W/L | 70.19% (73/31) |
| 65% (210/323) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (216/374) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 49% (33/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (32/64) |
| 43% (40/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (37/92) |
| 86% (218/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (234/202) |
| 14% (218/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (234/29) |
| 23% (109/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (152/22) |