Yeon Woo Ku vs Himari Sato Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ku vs Sato analysis and find out who is favored!
Yeon Woo Ku vs Himari Sato Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ku has won 41.98% of points on his second serve, while Sato has won 31.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ku, in recent form, has won 62.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sato has won 53.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.27% and 38.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ku has saved 54.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sato has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ku has won 60% of matches played (W/L 33/ 22), with Sato winning 29.17% (W/L 7/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ku has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 19/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 92/ 56). Sato has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ku has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.18% of matches (W/L 29/ 20), where as Sato has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 15.38% of matches (W/L 2/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ku winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ku winning 2 and Sato winning 0. The last match between Ku and Sato was at the W15 Almada, 13-07-2021, First, Hard with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ku and Sato have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ku winning 0 times and Sato 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ku winning 0, and Sato 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ku has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.13 while Sato has played against players with an average rank of 167.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ku has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sato has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ku has converted 53.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sato has converted 48.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ku 1 - 0 Sato
Yeon Woo Ku
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
472
Rank
411
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
787
Rank
685
High
22
Age
Plays
Himari Sato
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
64% (135-75)
Career Total W/L
46% (88-102)
68% (17-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$2,930
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Yeon Woo Ku | Himari Sato |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (31/58) | 54% (31/57) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (21/31) | 48% (15/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (11/27) | 35% (9/26) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 58% (33/57) | 45% (26/58) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Himari Sato
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Yeon Woo Ku | Himari Sato |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 68% (17/8) | 0% (0/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (38/20) | 0% (0/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (291/216) | 20% (3/12) |
Hard Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.14 |
Aces Total | 23 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0.33 | 1 |
DFs Total | 83 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:26 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 305.2 | 428 |
1st Serve % | 66% (854/1293) | 67% (30/45) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (548/854) | 47% (14/30) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (188/439) | 13% (2/15) |
BPs Won% Total | 54% (111/207) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Pts W% | 52% (697/1347) | 39% (20/51) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (17/24) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Yeon Woo Ku Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Elena Malygina
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Aanya Choubey
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
F | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Daria Kudashova
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Irina Maria Bara
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Himari Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Himari Sato
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mio Mushika
Player
Himari Sato
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
52%
(
41 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Belle Thompson
Player
Himari Sato
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Momoko Kobori
Player
Himari Sato
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Himari Sato
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Louna Zoppas
Player
Himari Sato
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(10) 0-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michika Ozeki
Player
Himari Sato
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
35%
(
16 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
52%
(
57 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
61 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(1) 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Himari Sato
Player
Nanari Katsumi
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Himari Sato
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Himari Sato
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more