K. Uchida
To Win
Y. Uchiyama
To Win
Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Taro Daniel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W L
Form
L W W L L W L L L LHead To Head: Uchiyama 0 - 2 Daniel
They have played 4 sets in total, with Uchiyama winning 0 and Daniel winning 4. The last match between Uchiyama and Daniel was at the Kobe Challenger, 15-11-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yasutaka Uchiyama | 0 |
| Taro Daniel | 2 |
Kobe Challenger(15-11-2024)
6
3
6
4
| Uchiyama | Stats | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (4-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 209 | Ranking | 131 |
| 78 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 32 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 14 |
| 56% (454-364) | Career Total W/L | 58% (573-422) |
| $363,245 | Career Prize Money | $2,262,594 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-2 2-1 ret. |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 10 | Games Won | 20 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:16:56 | Average Match Time | 1:16:56 |
| 48% (48/101) | 1st Serve % | 58% (56/97) |
| 71% (34/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (44/56) |
| 40% (21/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 32% (31/97) | Return Points Win % | 46% (46/101) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yasutaka Uchiyama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Soon-Woo Kwon
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
42%
(
36 of
86)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jozef Kovalik
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Taro Daniel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (454/364) | Win/Loss | 58% (573/422) |
| 54% (1021/879) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1316/1035) |
| 52% (9561/8876) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11475/10599) |
| 58% (332/241) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (203/161) |
| 56% (50/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (304/204) |
| 49% (62/65) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (59/42) |
| 36% (10/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 32% (7/15) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 3971 | Aces Total | 2471 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1205 | Total Double Faults | 1998 |
| 1:12:47 | Average Match Time | 1:22:59 |
| 548.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 485.52 |
| 62% (26012/41861) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35523/56814) |
| 73% (18979/26012) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (24101/35523) |
| 51% (8125/15849) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10841/21282) |
| 38% (1302/3437) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2402/5588) |
| 36% (15285/42360) | Return Points Win % | 39% (21992/56024) |
| 33% (15/30) | Slam W/L | 46% (37/43) |
| 31% (4/9) | Masters W/L | 45% (36/44) |
| 40% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 42% (31/43) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (127/122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (245/208) | Challenger W/L | 63% (230/134) |
| 69% (157/71) | Futures W/L | 66% (133/69) |
| 56% (445/796) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (549/935) |
| 33% (4/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 48% (151/317) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (162/307) |
| 56% (144/258) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (148/297) |
| 85% (438/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (590/498) |
| 15% (438/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (590/91) |
| 21% (380/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (405/72) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
