Yannick Mertens vs Sumit Nagal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mertens vs Nagal analysis and find out who is favored!
Yannick Mertens vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mertens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nagal has won 54.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mertens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nagal has won 55.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mertens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nagal has saved 62.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mertens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Nagal winning 63.41% (W/L 52/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mertens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 206/ 129), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 210/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Mertens has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.16% of matches (W/L 45/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mertens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mertens winning 2 and Nagal winning 0. The last match between Mertens and Nagal was at the Bangalore Challenger, 21-10-2015, Second, Hard with Yannick Mertens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mertens and Nagal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mertens winning 0 times and Nagal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mertens winning 1, and Nagal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mertens has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 283.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mertens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nagal has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mertens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nagal has converted 43.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mertens 1 - 0 Nagal
28
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
28
Minor
878
Rank
179
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
97
Rank
97
High
26
Age
R
Plays
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
59% (629-443)
Career Total W/L
61% (313-202)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
64% (14-8)
$72,235
Career Prize Money
$424,025
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Yannick Mertens | Sumit Nagal |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:20 | 1:22:20 |
1st Serve % | 62% (44/71) | 53% (31/59) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (29/44) | 52% (16/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (16/27) | 57% (16/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Points W% | 46% (27/59) | 37% (26/71) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-6(4) |
Yannick Mertens
Player
Sumit Nagal
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Yannick Mertens | Sumit Nagal |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (34/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (275/218) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
Aces Total | 0 | 45 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 0 | 30 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:53:9 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 222.18 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (1117/1580) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (765/1117) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (254/463) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (70/156) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (660/1613) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (18/14) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (18/4) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Yannick Mertens Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adrien Gobat
Player
Yannick Mertens
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
James McCabe
Player
Yannick Mertens
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joao Domingues
Player
Yannick Mertens
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lucas Gerch
Player
Yannick Mertens
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Yannick Mertens
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Yannick Mertens
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo Martineau
Player
Yannick Mertens
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Yannick Mertens
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hugo Gaston
Player
Yannick Mertens
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yannick Mertens
Player
Luke Johnson
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
7
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
112
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
84%
(
41 of
49)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Sumit Nagal
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Adam Walton
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H |
view more