Yanki Erel vs Ke Hau Hung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Aug at 03:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Erel vs K. Hau Hung

 TUR
0
Win
Played
0
Win

 TPE
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: 0 - 0 Hung
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Erel | 0 | 
| Hung | 0 | 
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
Y. Erel vs K. H. Hung H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 61.34% (219-138) | Career Total W/L | 45.16% (14-17) | 
| 9 | Titles | 0 | 
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
Y. Erel vs K. H. Hung Match Preview:
- How does the second serve performance compare? Hung has a lower success rate at 34.62% compared to Erel's 44.51%, indicating Erel is stronger in this aspect.
- Regarding return game capability, Hung has capitalized on 42.86% of their opponent's second serve points, slightly less than Erel's 43%. However, on first serve returns, Erel outperforms Hung 28.62% to 21.9%.
- Under pressure, Erel's effectiveness shines with 53.48% of breakpoints saved versus Hung's 38.1%, suggesting Erel handles pressure more effectively.
- Erel's winning percentage over the past year is higher at 66.13% (41 wins, 21 losses) relative to Hung's 50% (7 wins, 7 losses).
- Erel's best surface is indoor hard courts with a 70% winning rate, whereas Hung performs best on clay, winning 50% of their matches.
- Both players have participated mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Erel outpacing Hung by winning 66% of their matches versus Hung's 50%.
- Why could the quality of opponents impact predictions? Although Hung has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 149.71, Erel contends with those averaging 403.26, which might give a different context to their winning percentage.
- If the contest reaches a deciding set, Hung holds the advantage, winning all such sets in the past year contrasted to Erel's 50% success rate.
- Break point conversion analysis reveals Hung's proficiency, converting 40% of their opportunities, superior to Erel who has accomplished 29.82%.
Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):
Comparing recent second serve performances, Erel appears stronger, winning a greater percentage of points than Hung. This points to a significant advantage for Erel in maintaining service games.
In return games, while both players are nearly matched on second serve returns, Erel has the upper hand on first serve returns. This could serve Erel well in breaking Hung's serve more frequently.
Under breaking pressure, Erel's fortress-like temperament is clear, having saved a higher percentage of breakpoints compared to Hung, which suggests Erel may withstand critical points better.
Analyzing performance over the past year, Erel's greater match win ratio of 66.13%, compared to Hung's even record, speaks to a more consistent performance level over that period.
In terms of surface preference, Erel's strength on indoor hard courts may not come into play unless the match is on similar terrain but remains a factor of consideration.
Although Hung wrestles against stronger-ranked players, which might explain some of their losses, Erel seems equipped with a better win record overall.
Considering these comprehensive stats, Erel emerges as the player more likely to seize victory in this upcoming match. Their higher breakpoint save rate, superior win record, and effectiveness on first serve returns strengthen Erel's candidacy as the predicted winner.
Yanki Erel vs Ke Hau Hung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Erel Recent Matches Played
K. H. Hung Recent Matches Played

Y. Erel vs K. H. Hung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.34% (219/138) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.16% (14/17) | 
| 60.07% (486/323) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.06% (32/36) | 
| 54.76% (4056/3351) | Games Win/Loss | 50.47% (323/317) | 
| 67.39% (155/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.48% (10/13) | 
| 43.18% (38/50) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) | 
| 68.42% (26/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 | 
| 982 | Aces Total | 12 | 
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 | 
| 799 | Total Double Faults | 20 | 
| 1:36:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 515.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 193.65 | 
| 66% (14953/22779) | 1st Serve % | 69% (374/540) | 
| 68% (10131/14953) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (241/374) | 
| 52% (4041/7826) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (69/166) | 
| 45% (1124/2498) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (21/38) | 
| 42% (9494/22743) | Return Points Win % | 36% (192/538) | 
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.00% (32/32) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 64.91% (185/100) | Futures W/L | 45.16% (14/17) | 
| 62% (214/345) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (14/31) | 
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 48% (43/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 
| 51% (50/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (2/6) | 
| 85% (222/189) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (14/13) | 
| 14% (222/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (14/1) | 
| 22% (134/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (17/1) | 












