Wilson Leite vs Kyle Kang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leite vs Kang analysis and find out who is favored!
Wilson Leite vs Kyle Kang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leite has won 49.05% of points on his second serve, while Kang has won 49.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leite, in recent form, has won 52.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kang has won 53.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.96% and 33.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leite has saved 56.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kang has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leite has won 43.33% of matches played (W/L 26/ 34), with Kang winning 55.56% (W/L 15/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leite has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 336/ 331), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8). Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Leite has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 18/ 24), where as Kang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 13/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Leite winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Leite winning 2 and Kang winning 0. The last match between Leite and Kang was at the M15 Orange Park, 21-04-2022, Second, Clay with Wilson Leite getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Leite and Kang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Leite winning 0 times and Kang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Leite winning 0, and Kang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leite has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.75 while Kang has played against players with an average rank of 219.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leite has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kang has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leite has converted 46.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kang has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Leite 1 - 0 Kang
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
587
Rank
341
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
683
Rank
591
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
49% (390-406)
Career Total W/L
52% (43-40)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$1,515
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Wilson Leite | Kyle Kang |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (45/66) | 64% (52/81) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (29/45) | 48% (25/52) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 52% (15/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Points W% | 51% (41/81) | 39% (26/66) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
Wilson Leite
Player
Kyle Kang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Wilson Leite | Kyle Kang |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 40% (2/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (12/16) | 45% (5/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (114/125) | 50% (50/50) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 14 | 11 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.14 |
DFs Total | 17 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:55 | 1:32:42 |
Avg Opp Rank | 257 | 217 |
1st Serve % | 59% (467/795) | 60% (191/320) |
1st Serve W% | 58% (272/467) | 66% (126/191) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (161/328) | 47% (61/129) |
BPs Won% Total | 51% (43/85) | 46% (16/35) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (344/766) | 40% (124/312) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 40% (2/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Wilson Leite Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Wilson Leite
Player
Franco Roncadelli
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
85%
(
55 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Wilson Leite
Player
Marcelo Zormann
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ignacio Antonio Becerra Otarola
Player
Wilson Leite
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Wilson Leite
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Wilson Leite
Player
Estaban Davila
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
Player
Wilson Leite
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Wilson Leite
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Wilson Leite
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Kang
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Kang
Player
Axel Nefve
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matias Soto
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
August Holmgren
Player
Kyle Kang
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kyle Kang
Player
Karue Sell
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Kang
Player
Ozan Baris
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kyle Kang
Player
Alessio Vasquez Gehrke
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more