Wilson Leite vs Gabriel Schenekenberg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 04:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Leite vs G. Schenekenberg

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Leite 1 - 0 Schenekenberg
They have played 2 sets in total, with Wilson Leite winning 2 and Gabriel Schenekenberg winning 0. The last match between Wilson Leite and Gabriel Schenekenberg was at the M25 Santa Cruz do Sul, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Wilson Leite getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leite | 1 |
| Schenekenberg | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Santa Cruz do Sul(11-05-25)
W. Leite vs G. Schenekenberg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,515 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
W. Leite vs G. Schenekenberg Match Preview:
- Wilson Leite has outperformed Gabriel Schenekenberg in recent second serve effectiveness, winning 45.04% of points compared to Schenekenberg's 38.56%. Could this advantage be crucial in their match?
- When it comes to returning games, Leite has been slightly better on second serves with a 48.45% success rate, as opposed to Schenekenberg's 42.51%. Leite also edges out Schenekenberg on first serve returns.
- Under pressure, both players have similar performance levels, saving over 50% of breakpoints each. Is this a sign that the match could be tightly contested?
- Schenekenberg shows a stronger overall win percentage over the past year at 52.08% compared to Leite’s 38.89%. Does this indicate a more consistent performance?
- Surface preferences highlight Leite's strength on Clay and vulnerability on I.hard, while Schenekenberg prefers I.hard but is weaker on Hard courts.
- In terms of playing levels, Schenekenberg leads with a better win record in $10K tournaments and has faced significantly higher-ranked opponents than Leite.
- Deciding set scenarios seem favorable for Schenekenberg, having won 64% compared to Leite’s 40% in the past year.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Wilson Leite and Gabriel Schenekenberg showcases intriguing dynamics based on recent performance statistics and historical play styles.
Leite seems to have a subtle edge in second serve performance and return games, which are pivotal statistics. However, the slightly higher winning percentage and better performance in deciding sets make Schenekenberg a formidable opponent.
Schenekenberg’s past year also reflects a stronger track record of success against higher-ranked competitors, reflecting adaptability and resilience against tougher opponents.
Analyzing the comprehensive data, Gabriel Schenekenberg emerges as the more probable victor in the upcoming game, primarily due to his consistent performance across diverse conditions and his success in high-pressure situations.
Wilson Leite vs Gabriel Schenekenberg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Leite vs G. Schenekenberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:28:49 | Average Match Time | 1:28:49 |
| 60% (28/47) | 1st Serve % | 46% (21/46) |
| 79% (22/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (26/46) | Return Points Win % | 34% (16/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Leite Recent Matches Played
G. Schenekenberg Recent Matches Played

W. Leite vs G. Schenekenberg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.90% (423/460) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.85% (57/73) |
| 48.34% (978/1045) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.52% (126/157) |
| 49.68% (9277/9398) | Games Win/Loss | 48.38% (1303/1390) |
| 44.09% (56/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.86% (9/12) |
| 48.86% (363/380) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.93% (47/60) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 793 | Aces Total | 93 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 921 | Total Double Faults | 121 |
| 1:15:3 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 537.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 113.37 |
| 62% (24961/40479) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1913/3008) |
| 62% (15538/24961) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1191/1913) |
| 49% (7587/15518) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (506/1095) |
| 45% (1973/4368) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (103/239) |
| 42% (16867/39917) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1095/2904) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39.73% (89/135) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 50.77% (330/320) | Futures W/L | 45.24% (57/69) |
| 48% (416/873) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (57/130) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (93/197) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (8/19) |
| 47% (123/260) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 83% (424/353) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (58/52) |
| 17% (424/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (58/6) |
| 15% (459/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (72/5) |