William Mclennaghan vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 01:11 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Mclennaghan vs M. Nazim Makhlouf

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ALG
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Mclennaghan 0 - 1 Makhlouf
They have played 2 sets in total, with William Mclennaghan winning 0 and Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf winning 2. The last match between Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf and William Mclennaghan was at the M15 Monastir, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mclennaghan | 0 |
| Makhlouf | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Monastir(07-09-25)
W. Mclennaghan vs M. N. Makhlouf H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 34.85% (23-43) | Career Total W/L | 51.88% (166-154) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
W. Mclennaghan vs M. N. Makhlouf Match Preview:
- How do both players perform on their second serve? Makhlouf has secured 43.73% of points compared to Mclennaghan's 43.48%, a marginal difference suggesting similar performance levels.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Mclennaghan has a slight edge, winning 42.37% of points against Makhlouf's 41.24%.
- Does the first serve return stat favor anyone? Makhlouf prevails here with 31.44%, outperforming Mclennaghan's 29.91%.
- Under pressure, Mclennaghan excels, saving 63.64% of breakpoints in contrast to Makhlouf's 58.85%.
- When considering overall performance in the past year, Makhlouf's win rate is 54.32%, significantly higher than Mclennaghan's 38.1%.
- Both have their best win percentage on hard courts, but Makhlouf is better, winning 57%, while Mclennaghan wins only 38%.
- Makhlouf generally competes at a lower level, facing opponents with an average rank of 241.7, whereas Mclennaghan plays against tougher competition, with an average rank of 82.71.
- If this match reaches a deciding set, Mclennaghan holds an advantage, having won 50% compared to Makhlouf's 38% of such sets.
- What about breakpoint conversion rates? Mclennaghan shines with a 70% conversion rate, vastly outperforming Makhlouf, who has just a 26.92% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Makhlouf and Mclennaghan presents an intriguing clash of differing strengths. While Makhlouf has demonstrated consistent performance, with a remarkable overall win rate and a stronger first serve return capability, Mclennaghan holds some promising advantages.
Notably, Mclennaghan's ability to withstand pressure, as evidenced by superior breakpoint conversion and saving rates, might play a pivotal role. Additionally, Mclennaghan has faced stronger competition on average, which could provide an edge in handling high-stakes scenarios.
Considering these elements, especially Mclennaghan's effectiveness during crucial points and the experience against tougher opponents, Mclennaghan appears slightly more likely to secure victory in this matchup.
William Mclennaghan vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Mclennaghan vs M. N. Makhlouf H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:13:35 | Average Match Time | 1:13:35 |
| 61% (28/46) | 1st Serve % | 61% (19/31) |
| 64% (18/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (14/19) |
| 22% (4/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (8/12) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 29% (9/31) | Return Points Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Mclennaghan Recent Matches Played
M. N. Makhlouf Recent Matches Played

W. Mclennaghan vs M. N. Makhlouf Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.85% (23/43) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.88% (166/154) |
| 38.19% (55/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.36% (377/343) |
| 46.48% (628/723) | Games Win/Loss | 51.22% (3460/3295) |
| 39.66% (23/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.19% (127/99) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.24% (33/49) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 24 | Aces Total | 465 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 60 | Total Double Faults | 377 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 102.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 307.84 |
| 60% (513/860) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7071/11901) |
| 58% (297/513) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4500/7071) |
| 45% (157/347) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2222/4830) |
| 41% (25/61) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (514/1195) |
| 35% (263/754) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4811/12006) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 34.85% (23/43) | Futures W/L | 52.20% (166/152) |
| 35% (23/65) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (161/315) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 45% (5/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (25/59) |
| 31% (4/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (32/79) |
| 73% (30/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (164/142) |
| 27% (30/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (164/21) |
| 3% (36/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (156/23) |