William Mclennaghan vs Liam Hignett Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 05:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Mclennaghan vs L. Hignett

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Mclennaghan 0 - 1 Hignett
They have played 2 sets in total, with William Mclennaghan winning 0 and Liam Hignett winning 2. The last match between Liam Hignett and William Mclennaghan was at the M25 Glasgow, 26-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Hignett getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mclennaghan | 0 |
| Hignett | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Glasgow(10-26-25)
W. Mclennaghan vs L. Hignett H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 34.85% (23-43) | Career Total W/L | 35.71% (25-45) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
W. Mclennaghan vs L. Hignett Match Preview:
- William Mclennaghan has excelled slightly over Liam Hignett on second serve points, winning 44.78% compared to Hignett's 43.48%. Does this give Mclennaghan an edge? Possibly.
- When returning second serves, Mclennaghan again holds an advantage with 46.34% success versus Hignett's 45.86%. However, Hignett is more proficient at returning first serves, achieving 26.59% over Mclennaghan's 20.77%.
- Under pressure, Hignett saves 57.02% of breakpoints, outperforming Mclennaghan who saves 51.90%—a crucial factor during tight games.
- In match wins over the past year, Mclennaghan edges Hignett slightly, winning 42.86% of his matches compared to Hignett's 41.18%.
- Both players excel on hard surfaces with a 40% win rate; neither has success on clay. Is this clash expected on their favored terrain?
- Regarding playing level, both compete primarily in Futures/ITF tournaments, with similar percentages in match wins, which may indicate comparable experience.
- Mclennaghan has faced more highly-ranked opponents on average, at rank 107.5, while Hignett's opposition averages at 200.35. Is Mclennaghan the seasoned player? Evidence suggests so.
- In deciding set circumstances, Mclennaghan shines by winning 67% of them, while Hignett struggles, having yet to win a deciding set in the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
This matchup presents an intriguing battle between William Mclennaghan and Liam Hignett, with both showing strengths in specific aspects of tennis. Mclennaghan's slight edge in second serve effectiveness and experience against higher-ranked opponents may grant him an upper hand.
Meanwhile, Hignett showcases an ability to return first serves with higher success and more efficiently saves breakpoints, indicating resilience under pressure. However, his struggle with closing out deciding sets could be a vulnerability.
The match outcome might heavily depend on who can handle the pressure and capitalize on their strengths the best. Considering the data and performance patterns, William Mclennaghan is likely to emerge as the victor in this matchup.
William Mclennaghan vs Liam Hignett Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Mclennaghan vs L. Hignett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Mclennaghan Recent Matches Played
L. Hignett Recent Matches Played

W. Mclennaghan vs L. Hignett Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.85% (23/43) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.71% (25/45) |
| 38.19% (55/89) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.62% (63/96) |
| 46.48% (628/723) | Games Win/Loss | 46.54% (747/858) |
| 39.66% (23/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.39% (13/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 24 | Aces Total | 271 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 60 | Total Double Faults | 169 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:21:58 |
| 100.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 172.57 |
| 60% (513/860) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2259/3862) |
| 58% (297/513) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1520/2259) |
| 45% (157/347) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (777/1603) |
| 41% (25/61) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (119/303) |
| 35% (263/754) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1414/3890) |
| 34.85% (23/43) | Futures W/L | 35.71% (25/45) |
| 35% (23/65) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (25/70) |
| 45% (5/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (10/19) |
| 31% (4/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (6/19) |
| 73% (30/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 72% (29/21) |
| 27% (30/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 28% (29/8) |
| 3% (36/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (41/4) |