William Grant vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 May at 02:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
W. Grant vs T. Zink

USA
1
Win
Played
2
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Grant 1 - 2 Zink
They have played 7 sets in total, with William Grant winning 3 and Tyler Zink winning 4. The last match between Tyler Zink and William Grant was at the M15 Orange Park, 02-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Tyler Zink getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Grant | 1 |
Zink | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Orange Park(05-02-25)
(R2) M25 Ithaca(01-09-25)
(R1) M15 Pittsburgh(07-25-23)
W. Grant vs T. Zink H2H Profile
W. Grant vs T. Zink Match Preview:
Tyler Zink and Grant will face each other in an upcoming tennis match, with statistics suggesting a closely contested encounter. Over the past year, Zink has displayed superior match performance, securing victory in 68.12% of his matches, while Grant achieved a win rate of 50.85%. This performance disparity provides an overall head-to-head prediction in Zink's favor.
Analyzing their recent form, Zink has outperformed Grant slightly on second serve points, winning 44.68% compared to Grant's 42.86%. Conversely, when it comes to returning games, Grant has excelled by winning 46.77% of his opponent's second serve points, surpassing Zink's 43.03%. Their first serve return statistics are relatively close, with Zink at 25.5% and Grant at 25.08%, indicating minimal difference in their return abilities.
A review of their break-point performance reveals that Zink and Grant are closely matched under pressure, with Zink saving 53% of break points and Grant 53.51%. Despite this minor edge, Zink's higher breakpoint conversion rate of 27.42% as opposed to Grant's 29.49% slightly favors Grant in potential breakpoint scenarios.
On the indoor hard courts, both players have demonstrated notable success. Zink wins 62% on this surface, with Grant slightly behind at 58%. This proficiency might be pivotal, as the match takes place on Zink's preferred surface. Over the past 12 months, average opponent rankings faced by Zink and Grant were 394.88 and 353.78 respectively, indicating Grant might have had a marginally tougher competition.
In head-to-head confrontations, Zink and Grant are evenly matched, with each player securing one victory in their two previous encounters. However, Zink claimed the last match at the M 25 Ithaca, winning in a decisive three-set battle. While Grant has an edge in extreme pressure situations, having won their only tiebreak, Zink has shown superior deciding set performance over the last year, winning 77% of such matches.
Reflecting on these statistics, Zink appears to have a slight edge over Grant. If the match goes the distance, Zink’s proven ability to win deciding sets could be a critical factor. Given these analyses, Tyler Zink seems likely to emerge victorious given his recent form and head-to-head advantage.
William Grant vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
W. Grant vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
3 | Sets Won | 4 |
26 | Games Won | 37 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:35:51 | Average Match Time | 1:35:51 |
61% (140/228) | 1st Serve % | 61% (104/171) |
63% (88/140) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (80/104) |
48% (42/88) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (37/67) |
45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 39% (11/28) |
32% (54/171) | Return Points Win % | 43% (98/228) |
33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
W. Grant Recent Matches Played
T. Zink Recent Matches Played

W. Grant vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
51.44% (107/101) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.95% (100/82) |
51.18% (238/227) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.78% (218/195) |
49.99% (2151/2152) | Games Win/Loss | 51.08% (2036/1950) |
50.75% (34/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
50.43% (58/57) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
57.69% (15/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (18/12) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
591 | Aces Total | 812 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
506 | Total Double Faults | 375 |
1:14:29 | Average Match Time | 1:34:51 |
348.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.04 |
59% (5920/10041) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6811/11598) |
67% (3962/5920) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4808/6811) |
47% (1959/4130) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2396/4787) |
42% (435/1032) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (420/1092) |
40% (4112/10209) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4301/11291) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
28.57% (4/10) | Challenger W/L | 45.65% (21/25) |
53.37% (103/90) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
51% (106/207) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (99/181) |
47% (25/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
50% (25/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
89% (105/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (101/88) |
11% (105/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (101/13) |
14% (103/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (81/12) |