Vuk Radjenovic vs Matthew Forbes Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 08:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Radjenovic vs M. Forbes

SRB
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Radjenovic 0 - 1 Forbes
They have played 3 sets in total, with Vuk Radjenovic winning 1 and Matthew Forbes winning 2. The last match between Matthew Forbes and Vuk Radjenovic was at the M25 East Lansing, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Matthew Forbes getting the victory 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Radjenovic | 0 |
| Forbes | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 East Lansing(11-05-25)
V. Radjenovic vs M. Forbes H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.63% (50-45) | Career Total W/L | 53.85% (14-12) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
V. Radjenovic vs M. Forbes Match Preview:
- Who has the edge on second serve performance? Vuk Radjenovic holds a slight advantage with a 43.64% win rate compared to Matthew Forbes' 40.80% over the past six months.
- In terms of return game, Matthew Forbes performs slightly better on second serve returns, winning 43.30% of points compared to Vuk Radjenovic's 42.65%. When it comes to first serve returns, Radjenovic stands out with a 28.12% success rate against Forbes' 23.32%.
- Under pressure, Matthew Forbes has been more effective, saving 57.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vuk Radjenovic has saved 51.43% of breakpoints.
- Looking at overall match performance over the last year, Matthew Forbes has a higher match win percentage at 52.94%, while Vuk Radjenovic has managed 40.91%.
- Surface preference plays a role too, with Radjenovic excelling on clay with a 55% win rate, while Forbes finds success on hard courts, also with a 55% win percentage.
- Both players predominantly compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level, where Forbes has the superior win rate.
- Radjenovic has faced tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 214.41, in contrast to Forbes' average opponent rank of 431.12 over the past year.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Forbes appears more resilient, winning 67% of deciding sets, compared to Radjenovic's 25% win rate.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent second serve performance, Vuk Radjenovic appears to have a slight edge over Matthew Forbes, indicating a potential advantage in this match.
Both players show strengths in different aspects of return games, yet Forbes' overall pressure handling with a higher breakpoint save percentage can make a significant difference.
Despite Radjenovic having played against generally tougher competitors, Forbes' ability to conquer deciding sets gives him a noteworthy advantage if the match reaches that stage.
Considering all available statistics, including surface performance and overall match win percentages, Matthew Forbes emerges as the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Vuk Radjenovic vs Matthew Forbes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Radjenovic vs M. Forbes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 15 | Games Won | 19 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:57:57 | Average Match Time | 2:57:57 |
| 53% (65/123) | 1st Serve % | 61% (62/101) |
| 71% (46/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (47/62) |
| 43% (25/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 32% (6/19) |
| 36% (36/101) | Return Points Win % | 42% (52/123) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. Radjenovic Recent Matches Played
M. Forbes Recent Matches Played

V. Radjenovic vs M. Forbes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.63% (50/45) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 51.15% (111/106) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.15% (29/30) |
| 50.94% (1052/1013) | Games Win/Loss | 52.02% (283/261) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 55.17% (48/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 206 | Aces Total | 105 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 432 | Total Double Faults | 90 |
| 1:24:49 | Average Match Time | 1:22:58 |
| 315.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.65 |
| 54% (2878/5316) | 1st Serve % | 58% (792/1364) |
| 67% (1914/2878) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (551/792) |
| 45% (1109/2439) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (265/572) |
| 43% (242/557) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (50/126) |
| 41% (2172/5255) | Return Points Win % | 38% (488/1278) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.63% (50/45) | Futures W/L | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 52% (49/94) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (14/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (12/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 57% (16/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 84% (51/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 16% (51/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 16% (44/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (14/3) |