Victoria Pohle vs Lola Giza Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 01:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Pohle vs L. Giza

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Pohle 1 - 0 Giza
They have played 1 sets in total, with Victoria Pohle winning 1 and Lola Giza winning 0. The last match between Victoria Pohle and Lola Giza was at the W15 Essen, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) ret..
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Pohle | 1 |
Giza | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Essen(10-14-25)
V. Pohle vs L. Giza H2H Profile
V. Pohle vs L. Giza Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In their recent performances, Lola Giza has a notable advantage, winning 42.07% of points on their second serve compared to Victoria Pohle's 37.92%. How might this impact the match outcome? This could give Giza a crucial edge in holding serve under pressure.
- Return Game Stats: While Victoria Pohle slightly edges out in returning first serves, winning 36.18%, Lola Giza excels slightly in returning second serves at 53.33% compared to Pohle's 53.17%. In close matches, could Giza's ability to win points on second serve returns be decisive? Potentially, as it might disrupt Pohle's service games.
- Breakpoint Resilience: Lola Giza demonstrates greater mental fortitude, saving 53.47% of breakpoints, which could be pivotal in high-pressure situations. Conversely, Pohle saves 44.44% of break points.
- Overall Performance Overview: In the past year, Victoria Pohle has a slightly better win percentage (45.83%) than Lola Giza (43.75%), indicating a marginally stronger form.
- Preferred Surface Analysis: Victoria Pohle has their best performance on indoor hard courts, whereas Lola Giza performs best on clay. The playing surface will therefore be a critical factor in predicting the match outcome.
- Player Level and Event Impact: Both players compete mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Pohle has a slightly better win rate at this level, providing a small edge in terms of experience and success.
- Quality of Opponents: Playing against tougher opponents could suggest higher endurance and adaptability, with Victoria Pohle facing a higher average ranked opponent.
- Deciding Set Performance: In scenarios where matches go to a deciding set, Pohle again has a slight edge, winning 45% of deciding sets compared to Giza's 43%.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the data, Lola Giza's superior second serve performance and strong breakpoint resilience position her as a formidable competitor. These strengths could provide the foundation for a more robust showing against Victoria Pohle in critical match patches.
Despite this, Pohle's consistent performance in facing higher-ranked opponents and her slightly better deciding set success could prove vital, particularly in a close encounter. The choice of playing surface will also likely sway the match dynamics, given each player's past surface preferences.
Overall, while both players present compelling cases, the balance tips slightly in favor of Victoria Pohle. Accounting for her marginally stronger form in different aspects of the game, she emerges as the likely winner in this upcoming match.
Victoria Pohle vs Lola Giza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Pohle vs L. Giza H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | Sets Won | 0 |
7 | Games Won | 6 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:4:23 | Average Match Time | 1:4:23 |
59% (29/49) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30/49) |
66% (19/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
35% (7/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
51% (25/49) | Return Points Win % | 47% (23/49) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. Pohle Recent Matches Played
L. Giza Recent Matches Played

V. Pohle vs L. Giza Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
45.24% (19/23) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.04% (10/17) |
45.36% (44/53) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.00% (26/39) |
45.94% (413/486) | Games Win/Loss | 47.10% (309/347) |
50.00% (2/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
42.42% (14/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.00% (10/15) |
60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
51 | Aces Total | 17 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
133 | Total Double Faults | 80 |
1:22:34 | Average Match Time | 1:12:17 |
423.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.85 |
59% (1381/2331) | 1st Serve % | 66% (868/1317) |
58% (798/1381) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (483/868) |
38% (364/950) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (193/449) |
48% (140/293) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (70/154) |
47% (1076/2298) | Return Points Win % | 45% (575/1284) |
36.36% (8/14) | Challenger W/L | 31.58% (6/13) |
55.00% (11/9) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
43% (17/40) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (10/26) |
64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
47% (7/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
78% (18/14) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (9/7) |
22% (18/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (9/2) |
21% (24/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (18/3) |