Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva vs Shanice Roignot Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kasintseva vs Roignot analysis and find out who is favored!
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva vs Shanice Roignot Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kasintseva has won 45.36% of points on his second serve, while Roignot has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kasintseva, in recent form, has won 55.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Roignot has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kasintseva has saved 57.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Roignot has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kasintseva has won 49.09% of matches played (W/L 27/ 28), with Roignot winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kasintseva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 54/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Roignot has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kasintseva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Roignot has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kasintseva has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.55 while Roignot has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kasintseva has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Roignot has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kasintseva has converted 49.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Roignot has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kasintseva 0 - 0 Roignot
4
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
348
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (99-77)
Career Total W/L
22% (2-7)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$57,400
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kasintseva VS Roignot H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | Shanice Roignot |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (25/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (217/190) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.06 | 0 |
Aces Total | 12 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
DFs Total | 69 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:4:43 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 367.47 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (880/1376) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (524/880) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (234/496) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (87/176) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (646/1357) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
82 of
117)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
117)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Lucie Havlickova
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Laura Hietaranta
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Deborah Chiesa
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Anastasia Iamachkine
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Shanice Roignot Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Victoria Mboko
Player
Shanice Roignot
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
22 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tiffany William
Player
Shanice Roignot
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Naia Mercadier
Player
Shanice Roignot
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
63 of
80)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Shanice Roignot
Player
Nina Skoric
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
9
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Estelle Cascino
Player
Shanice Roignot
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more