Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Victor Hanescu vs Jarkko Nieminen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hanescu vs Nieminen analysis and find out who is favored!
Victor Hanescu vs Jarkko Nieminen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hanescu has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nieminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hanescu, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nieminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hanescu has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nieminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hanescu has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nieminen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hanescu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 312/ 191), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 37% (W/L 50/ 86). Nieminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 202/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 27/ 32).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Hanescu winning 1 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Hanescu winning 4 and Nieminen winning 8. The last match between Hanescu and Nieminen was at the Allianz Suisse Open - Gstaad, 26-07-2011, First, Clay with Jarkko Nieminen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:18:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hanescu and Nieminen have played a deciding set 2 times, with Hanescu winning 1 times and Nieminen 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Hanescu winning 1, and Nieminen 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hanescu has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nieminen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hanescu has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nieminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hanescu has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nieminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hanescu 1 - 3 Nieminen
Ret.
Rank
26
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
0
Hard0
1
Clay3
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
13
High
42
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
54% (474-398)
Career Total W/L
58% (574-409)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,745,580
Career Prize Money
$3,231,200
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Victor Hanescu | Jarkko Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 8 |
| Games Won | 52 | 64 |
| Aces (Total) | 21 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:18:11 | 0:18:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (195/313) | 68% (200/293) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (135/195) | 63% (126/200) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (43/118) | 49% (46/93) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (13/24) | 44% (18/41) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (121/293) | 43% (135/313) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Victor Hanescu
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(2) | |||||
| 6-7(1) 6-4 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Victor Hanescu
68%
(
116 of
170)
1st Serve %
56%
(
89 of
160)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
71 of
116)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
57 of
89)
43%
(
23 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
55%
(
11 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
76 of
170)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
74 of
160)
168
Total Points Won
162
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Victor Hanescu | Jarkko Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Victor Hanescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Victor Hanescu
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Juan Carlos Saez
Player
Victor Hanescu
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Facundo Mena
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Stefan Kozlov
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
69 of
125)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Peter Nagy
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Victor Hanescu
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Kaichi Uchida
77%
(
86 of
112)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
42 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Victor Hanescu
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hanescu Vs Nieminen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
