Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Victor Hanescu vs Facundo Bagnis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hanescu vs Bagnis analysis and find out who is favored!
Victor Hanescu vs Facundo Bagnis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hanescu has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bagnis has won 50.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hanescu, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bagnis has won 51.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hanescu has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bagnis has saved 65.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hanescu has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bagnis winning 61.67% (W/L 37/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hanescu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 312/ 191), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 37% (W/L 50/ 86). Bagnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 587/ 364), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hanescu winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Hanescu winning 2 and Bagnis winning 2. The last match between Hanescu and Bagnis was at the Credit Agricole Suisse Open - Gstaad, 25-07-2015, Q1 round, Clay with Victor Hanescu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hanescu and Bagnis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hanescu winning 0 times and Bagnis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hanescu winning 1, and Bagnis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hanescu has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bagnis has played against players with an average rank of 311.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hanescu has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bagnis has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hanescu has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bagnis has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hanescu 1 - 1 Bagnis
Ret.
Rank
26
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
137
Rank
55
High
34
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
54% (474-398)
Career Total W/L
59% (626-434)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
69% (18-8)
$1,745,580
Career Prize Money
$1,232,395
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Victor Hanescu | Facundo Bagnis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:45 | 1:25:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (93/128) | 75% (93/124) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (67/93) | 66% (61/93) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (16/35) | 55% (17/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (46/124) | 35% (45/128) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-1 |
Stats 
Victor Hanescu
Player
Facundo Bagnis
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Victor Hanescu
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Victor Hanescu | Facundo Bagnis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (18/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (38/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (316/273) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 74% (17/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 96 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:3:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 319.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1242/1950) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (850/1242) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (357/708) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (87/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (810/1945) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (10/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (18/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Victor Hanescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Victor Hanescu
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Juan Carlos Saez
Player
Victor Hanescu
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Facundo Mena
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Stefan Kozlov
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
69 of
125)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Peter Nagy
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Victor Hanescu
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Kaichi Uchida
77%
(
86 of
112)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
42 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Victor Hanescu
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Facundo Bagnis
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gustavo Heide
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Hugo Dellien
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Facundo Bagnis
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Facundo Bagnis
59%
(
74 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
13
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
56 of
74)
69%
(
35 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
40 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
34 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(4) 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Facundo Bagnis
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hanescu Vs Bagnis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
