Vickie Trocker vs Lama Nabil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trocker vs Nabil analysis and find out who is favored!
Vickie Trocker vs Lama Nabil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trocker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nabil has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trocker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nabil has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trocker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nabil has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trocker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nabil winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trocker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Nabil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trocker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trocker winning 2 and Nabil winning 0. The last match between Trocker and Nabil was at the W15 Cairo, 14-01-2020, Q3, Clay with Vickie Trocker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trocker and Nabil have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trocker winning 0 times and Nabil 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trocker winning 0, and Nabil 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trocker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nabil has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trocker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nabil has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trocker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nabil has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Trocker 1 - 0 Nabil
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
35% (7-13)
Career Total W/L
40% (4-6)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Vickie Trocker | Lama Nabil |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (38/54) | 84% (37/44) |
1st Serve Win% | 61% (23/38) | 38% (14/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 14% (1/7) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 66% (29/44) | 41% (22/54) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
Vickie Trocker
Player
Lama Nabil
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
84%
(
37 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Vickie Trocker | Lama Nabil |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Vickie Trocker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Julia Stamatova
Player
Vickie Trocker
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
24 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vickie Trocker
Player
Lama Nabil
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
84%
(
37 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Vitalia Stamat
Player
Vickie Trocker
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Vickie Trocker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Lama Nabil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Krystal Blanch
Player
Lama Nabil
43%
(
13 of
30)
1st Serve %
71%
(
20 of
28)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
48
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Vickie Trocker
Player
Lama Nabil
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
84%
(
37 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H |
view more