Varvara Panshina vs Polina Kuharenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When analyzing second serve points, Kuharenko has the advantage with a win rate of 41.74% compared to Panshina's 38.16%. This often reflects on match results.
• Panshina excels at returning her opponent's second serves, winning 48.61% of those points, but Kuharenko surpasses her with a 54.75% success rate.
• Both players perform similarly when returning first serves, with Panshina at 31.44% and Kuharenko close behind at 30.84%.
• How do these serve stats relate to their overall defensive capabilities? Kuharenko shows superior resistance under pressure, saving 65.85% of breakpoints, compared to Panshina's 45.95%.
• Both have a strong match win percentage over the last year, with Panshina at 69.84% and Kuharenko slightly higher at 70%.
• When looking at surface preference, Panshina has a slight edge on hard courts, winning 71% of her matches, over Kuharenko's 68%.
• In terms of competition level, Panshina has dominated in lower-tier events, winning 75% of her matches, while Kuharenko has a 70% win rate at the same level.
• Regarding opponent quality, Kuharenko has faced tougher competitors, with an average opponent rank of 247.4 versus Panshina's 337.89.
• In deciding sets, Panshina appears stronger, triumphing in 60% of these close matches, compared to Kuharenko's 56%.
• Examining breakpoint conversion, Kuharenko again leads, converting 46.51% of his opportunities, whereas Panshina converts 36.07%.
• What do their performance trends suggest? Kuharenko has consistently shown a slightly better record in various key areas.

Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):

In terms of recent form, Kuharenko appears to have a small but consistent edge over Panshina. His ability to win points on his second serve and return games indicates a slight tactical advantage.

Both players have performed well over the past year, with similar overall match win percentages. Nevertheless, Kuharenko has been challenging more highly ranked opponents, suggesting a readiness for tougher competition.

An assessment of surface preference also favors Panshina slightly; however, Kuharenko's break point performance and ability to save crucial points could prove decisive in close moments.

Overall, while both competitors have areas of strength, Kuharenko's consistent marginally better performance in several critical departments gives him the likeliest chance of securing victory in their upcoming match.