Varvara Lepchenko vs Tatjana Maria Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L W L
Form
W W L W W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Lepchenko 1 - 1 Maria
They have played 4 sets in total, with Lepchenko winning 2 and Maria winning 2. The last match between Lepchenko and Maria was at the Barranquilla Open - Barranquilla, 18-08-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Tatjana Maria getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Varvara Lepchenko | 1 |
| Tatjana Maria | 1 |
Barranquilla Open - Barranquilla(18-08-2023)
6
0
6
2
| Lepchenko | Stats | Maria |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (13-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 120 | Ranking | 80 |
| 19 | Highest Rank | 42 |
| 38 | Age | 37 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 23 |
| 56% (628-487) | Career Total W/L | 56% (653-518) |
| $3,235,725 | Career Prize Money | $2,699,997 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Tatjana Maria
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
||||
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Tatjana Maria
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 15 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:0:41 | Average Match Time | 1:0:41 |
| 54% (42/78) | 1st Serve % | 61% (54/88) |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (33/54) |
| 42% (15/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 42% (37/88) | Return Points Win % | 44% (34/78) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Varvara Lepchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Harriet Dart
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
109)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Elena Pridankina
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Sinja Kraus
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
39 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Dalila Spiteri
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
83%
(
49 of
59)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
41%
(
31 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatjana Maria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Tatjana Maria
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Tatjana Maria
63%
(
82 of
131)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
3
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
45%
(
59 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Tatjana Maria
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
115%
(
60 of
52)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Tatjana Maria
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Tatjana Maria
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Hanna Chang
46%
(
29 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
12
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Chloe Paquet
53%
(
63 of
118)
1st Serve %
46%
(
67 of
147)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
16
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
47 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
65 of
147)
136
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Tatjana Maria
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (628/487) | Win/Loss | 56% (653/518) |
| 56% (1438/1139) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1466/1186) |
| 52% (12429/11367) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12572/11557) |
| 58% (378/273) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (216/211) |
| 58% (183/130) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (213/178) |
| 48% (43/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (156/93) |
| 39% (24/37) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (68/36) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1635 | Aces Total | 2805 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2142 | Total Double Faults | 2073 |
| 1:4:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 458 | Average Opponent Rank | 456.79 |
| 67% (37957/56776) | 1st Serve % | 56% (29333/51926) |
| 61% (23298/37957) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (19241/29313) |
| 47% (8846/18819) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10274/22634) |
| 46% (3138/6763) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2729/5943) |
| 44% (25173/56944) | Return Points Win % | 43% (22175/51030) |
| 54% (74/63) | Slam W/L | 43% (44/59) |
| 53% (101/88) | Masters W/L | 40% (40/60) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (8/8) |
| 47% (153/172) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (138/182) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (295/163) | Challenger W/L | 66% (408/206) |
| 75% (3/1) | Futures W/L | 83% (15/3) |
| 57% (621/1099) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (640/1154) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (155/287) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (121/237) |
| 48% (173/359) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (155/327) |
| 84% (655/548) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (687/582) |
| 16% (655/105) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (687/104) |
| 17% (460/80) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (484/71) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
