Urszula Radwanska vs Sana Garakani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Radwanska is superior in second serve performance, winning 39.53% of points, compared to Garakani's 33.62%.
• Regarding return games, Garakani slightly edges out Radwanska with 53.55% points won on opponents' second serves versus Radwanska's 52.29%.
• For first serve returns, Garakani again outperforms with 35.14%, whereas Radwanska wins 31.61%.
• Considering breakpoints, Radwanska shows greater resilience by saving 46.21%, while Garakani saves 38.46%.
• Who performs better overall? Radwanska has a higher match-win rate, winning 55.56% over the past year compared to Garakani's 40%.
• On their preferred surface, Radwanska excels on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Garakani's best results come from clay, albeit with just a 36% win rate.
• Both players have differing strengths: Radwanska in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56%, whereas Garakani excels in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with a 61.54% win rate.
• Radwanska has faced tougher opponents on average (rank 417.67) than Garakani (rank 181.25), which impacts their win/loss statistics. Does this give Radwanska an edge?
• In terms of deciding set performances, Garakani narrowly leads with 67% wins, compared to Radwanska's 64%.
• Garakani has a higher breakpoint conversion rate, achieving 50.94% compared to Radwanska's 43.18%.

Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):

The matchup between Radwanska and Garakani presents an intriguing contrast of strengths and weaknesses. Both players demonstrate formidable capabilities but in varying aspects of the game. Radwanska, with a stronger overall match-win record and experience against higher-ranked opponents, exhibits resilience under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints.

Conversely, Garakani displays strengths in returning serves and converting breakpoint opportunities, areas that could sway momentum during pivotal moments of the match. Radwanska's past performance on indoor hard surfaces could be a decisive factor, especially as Garakani's performance on this surface is less effective.

Although Garakani shows slight advantages in return game and deciding set win percentage, Radwanska's performance patterns, coupled with experience against superior competition, position her as the likely winner in this upcoming encounter.