Tyler Zink vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When it comes to second serve performance over the last six months, how do Ficovich and Zink fare? Fictionh has clinched 45.56% of points on their second serve, whereas Zink edges slightly ahead with 45.66%. Such marginal differences often play a crucial role in match prediction accuracy. Who is more likely to dominate the match based on their return game prowess? Ficovich has won 46.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zink trails with 42.88%. Interestingly, for first serve returns, Zink surpasses Ficovich with 27.1% over 26.55%, offering a more complex forecast for this head-to-head clash.

Under pressure, who handles breakpoints better? Zink has managed to save 53.36% of breakpoints in recent matches, slightly better than Ficovich's 51.13%. These stats are invaluable for those interested in in-game betting predictions. Looking at their overall performance over the past year, who has had the upper hand? Ficovich's win-loss record stands at 56.1% (46 wins, 36 losses), while Zink boasts a more impressive 70.18% (40 wins, 17 losses), giving us a clearer picture of who might have the edge.

Examining their career surface preferences, who performs better on specific courts? Ficovich excels on clay, achieving a 60% win rate (341 wins, 232 losses), but struggles on grass with a 20% success rate (1 win, 4 losses). Conversely, Zink shines on indoor hard courts, securing 62% wins (16 wins, 10 losses), though has a decent 53% on hard surfaces (37 wins, 33 losses). The level of competition they've faced also highlights their difference; Ficovich has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with a 57.35% win rate, whereas Zink has dominated Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K with a 75.56% success rate.

What about the quality of their opponents? Ficovich has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 263.1, compared to Zink's 442.3 over the last 12 months. If the match extends to a deciding set, Zink's 76% success rate in such sets significantly tops Ficovich's 57%. Additionally, in terms of breakpoint conversion, Ficovich has turned 33.33% of opportunities into successful breaks, ahead of Zink’s 25.93%. These insights suggest that while both players have their strengths, Zink exhibits a slight advantage and is more likely to emerge victorious based on the current statistics.